1887

Abstract

In this abstract I compare theoretical and practical aspects of the Delft and the Inverse Scattering surface-related multiple attenuation. I first show the essential theoretical equivalence of the two using a simple three line mathematical argument. After that I look at similarities and differences in the implementation of the two methods, from deghosting, obliquity and antialiasing, to memory requirements and out-of-core pipelining, parallel processing and finally comparing their relative computational cost. Of particular note, I show that (1) no spatial FFT padding is required to suppress wraparound artifacts and (2) Fourier spatial interpolation does nothing whatsoever to reduce aliasing artifacts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20147935
2008-06-09
2020-11-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20147935
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error