1887

Abstract

Summary

Several techniques have been developed to modeling the wave equation. In this paper we introduce the frequency-domain finite-difference (FDFD) modeling and its implementation using the explicit (2nd and 4th) and implicit (nine-point) centered difference operators for solving the scalar Helmholtz equation. We discuss some proprieties of the resulting linear system after the discretization of the wave equation and show that our implemented nine-point implicit scheme produces a much more accurate result in comparison with the 2nd and 4th schemes for seismic wave simulations in the frequency domain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201527095
2015-07-27
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amestoy, P., Duff, I., L’Excellent, J.Y. and Koster, J.
    [2001] A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling. SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis and Applications, 23, 15–41, doi:10.1137/S0895479899358194.
    https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479899358194 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chu, C. and Stoffa, P.
    [2012] An implicit finite-difference operator for the helmholtz equation. Geophysics, 77, T97–T107, doi:10.1090/GEO2011‑0314.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1090/GEO2011-0314.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Shin, C.
    [1995] Sponge boundary condition for frequency-domain modeling. Geophysics, 60, 1870–1874, doi: 10.1190/1.1443918.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443918 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201527095
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201527095
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error