1887

Abstract

Summary

Digital rock physics (DRP) uses high-resolution pore-scale images of rocks to simulate electrical charge and fluid flow of rock. The critical question is how to upscale these transport properties on relatively large samples where the resolution is coarser than the pore scale. To address this question, we obtained plug-scale dual-energy 3D images of carbonate and sandstone samples with a voxel resolution of 300µm. As a result, we had 3D volumes of bulk density ρb and photoelectric factor Pf. The Pf volumes were used to obtain volume fractions of the minerals and then compute their grain density ρg. Next, ρb and ρg were used to compute total porosity . The electrical conductivity σ and absolute permeability k in each voxel were assumed to be related to according to the Archie’s and Kozeny-Carman equations. DRP results were compared to laboratory measurements. Excellent match was obtained for densities (ρb and ρg) and porosity . The effective electrical formation factor, Feff match was also good. The absolute permeability match between DRP and laboratory measurements appeared to be adequate. The methodology introduced here is a novel example of using 3D coarse-resolution dual energy CT-scan images of rock to estimate their effective transport properties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601064
2016-05-30
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M. and Zhan, X.
    [2013] Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archie, G.E.
    [1942] The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Society of petroleum engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carman, P.C.
    [1956]. Flow of gases through porous media. Academic press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Darcy, H.
    [1856] Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Victor Dalmont, Paris, 304–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fredrich, J.T., Greaves, K.H. and Martin, J.W.
    [1993] Pore geometry and transport properties of Fontainebleau sandstone. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts, 30(7), 691–697. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Iassonov, P., Gebrenegus, T. and Tuller, M.
    [2009] Segmentation of X-ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures. Water Resources Research, 45(9).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Keehm, Y.
    [2003] Computational rock physics: transport properties in porous media and applications.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liang, Z., Ioannidis, M.A. and Chatzis, I.
    [2000] Permeability and electrical conductivity of porous media from 3D stochastic replicas of the microstructure. Chemical engineering science, 55(22), 5247– 5262.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Olson, J.F. and Rothman, D.H.
    [1997] Two-fluid flow in sedimentary rock: simulation, transport and complexity. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 341, 343–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Plumb, R. et al.
    [1991] Geophysical log responses and their correlation with bed-to-bed stress contrasts in Paleozoic rocks, Appalachian plateau, New York. Journal of geophysical research, 96, B9, 14509– 14528.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sain, R.
    [2010] Numerical Simulation of Pore-Scale Heterogeneity and its Effects on Elastic, Electrical and Transport Properties. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, 198.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schön, J.
    [2011] Physical properties of rocks: a workbook. Oxford: Elsevier, 128–129.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601064
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601064
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error