Three-dimensional Marine CSEM Forward Modelling in the Flemish Pass Basin Using Realistic Unstructured Meshes

References

1. Ansari, S., and Farquharson, C.G.
   [2014] 3D finite-element forward modeling of electromagnetic data using vector and scalar potentials and unstructured grids. Geophysics, 79(4), E149–E165.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Badea, E.A., Everett, M.E., Newman, G.A, and Biro, O.
   [2001] Finite element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb gauged potentials. Geophysics, 66(3), 786–799.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Constable, S.
   [2010] Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics, 75(5), A67–A81.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fanavoll, S., Gabrielsen, P.T., and Ellingsrud, S.
   [2014] CSEM as a tool for better exploration decisions: Case studies from the Barents Sea, Norwegian Continental Shelf. Interpretation, 2(3), SH55-SH66.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Key, K.
   [2009] 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers. Geophysics, 74(2), F9–F20.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Newman, G.A., and Alumbaugh, D.L.
   [1995] Frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences. Geophysical Prospecting, 43, 1021– 1042.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Puzyrev, V., Koldan, J., de la Puente, J., Houzeaux, G., Vázquez, M., and Cela, J.M.
   [2013] A parallel finite-element method for three-dimensional controlled source electromagnetic forward modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 193, 678–693.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Rutherford, S.R., and Williams, R.H.
   [1989] Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands. Geophysics, 54(6) 680–688.
   [Google Scholar]