1887

Abstract

Summary

We examine the OASES program code as a potential alternative to wave propagation modeling techniques in microseismic research. We provide an overview on the mathematics and the numerics of OASES, which uses wavenumber integration and the Direct Global Matrix solution technique to model wave propagation in horizontally layered media. In order the increase the usability of OASES for complex source-receiver geometries, we introduce a predominantly automatic enhanced OASES workflow. This workflow is applied to two three-dimensional anisotropic full waveform modeling tests. In the first test, we compare synthetic seismograms computed with OASES to results from two previous studies by the PHASE consortium, which modeled wave propagation with a ray tracing algorithm and the finite difference method respectively. The comparison shows an excellent consistency between all three modeling techniques. The second test compares synthetic seismograms computed with OASES to picked wave arrivals from a microseismic dataset from the Horn River Basin in Canada. The consistency between the modeled and picked wave arrivals is satisfactory for most events, but indicates the necessity of further improvements on the provided velocity model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601416
2016-05-31
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Oelke, A., Krüger, O.S. and Shapiro, S.A.
    [2014] Modeling Wave Propagation in Anisotropic Media. 9th Annual PHASE Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Reshetnikov, A.
    [2014] Ray-tracing for Microseismic Monitoring in Strongly Anisotropic Media. 9th Annual PHASE Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Reshetnikov, A. and Shapiro, S.A.
    [2014] Common-receiver Gathers as a Tool for Analysis of Micro-seismic Waveforms and Quality of Time Picks. 9th Annual PHASE Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2015] Using Multipath Shear Wave Arrivals for Velocity Model Inversion and Microseismic Location in Strongly Anisotropic Shale. 10th Annual PHASE Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt, H.
    [2004] OASES Version 3.1 User Guide and Reference Manual. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmidt, H. and Tango, G.
    [1986] Efficient global matrix approach to the computation of synthetic seismograms. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 84(2), 331–359.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Schrank, F., Reshetnikov, A. and Shapiro, S.A.
    [2015] Arrival time picking and waveform analysis from recorded microseismic data in a highly anisotropic medium. Poster presentation, 10th Annual PHASE Workshop.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601416
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601416
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error