1887

Abstract

Summary

Including interpretations from airborne geophysical surveys to build geological models continues to improve outcomes for deriving more realistic geological representations. It is now highly practical for AEM data to be both forward modelled and inverted using 2.5D numerical approximations. In this paper we present one such code for performing these workflows: a finite element method that assumes a 2D Geological source and 3D electrical source. This is provided that the geo-electrical cross-section is relatively constant along a strike length that exceeds the AEM system footprint. Lines that exceed 30 kilometres can now be modelled and inverted on a standard laptop computer.

  • The AEM inversion technique presented is usefully capable of defining detailed geometry for synclines, anticlines and deeply dipping beds.
  • AEM 2.5D Inversion appears to match realistic geology trends to depths of up to 1 km and hence is cost-effective compared detailed drilling.
  • Experience shows it’s best to use a half-space starting model, slightly adapted to the gross resistivity characteristics of the observed signal.
  • Fully geologically-constrained inversion attempts to find the compromise between the observed geophysical signal, and the interpreted sections.
  • Rock properties in the form of estimated and inferred resistivities for each formation, play an integral part in this AEM inversion workflow.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601676
2016-05-30
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Silic, J., Paterson, R., FitzGerald, D. and Archer, T.
    [2015] Comparing 1D and 2.5D AEM inversions in 3D geological mapping using a new adaptive inversion solver. 14th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Leggatt, P.B., Klinkert, P.S. and Hage, T.B.
    , [2000] The Spectrem airborne electromagnetic system—further developments: Geophysics, 65(6), 1976–1982.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MundayT., Ley Cooper, Y., JohnsonS., and TylerI.
    [2013] A regional scale fixed-wing TDEM survey of the Palaeo-Proterozoic Bryah Basin, Western Australia: Providing insights into a geological setting highly prospective for VMS Cu-Au and mesothermal Au Systems. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2013, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. WilsonG., Raiche, A. and Sugeng, F.
    [2006] 2.5D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data. Exploration Geophysics, 37 (2006), 363–371.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601676
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601676
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error