1887

Abstract

Summary

Several models have been recently proposed to connect observations of velocity change with strain deformation in and around reservoirs undergoing production and recovery. In this work we show that a simple compliance-based model combined with the original conceptual understanding of can adequately explain the magnitude of R factor values currently observed from calibrated field data in a variety of settings. The model is also used to determine an expression for the gradient of overburden time-shift variation with incidence angle. This gradient is predicted to be low but may vary according to the ratio of tangential to normal compliance at the intergranular contacts. This factor could perhaps be used as an additional parameter to assess the post-production state of the overburden.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700483
2017-06-12
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angus, D.A., Verdon, J.P., Fisher, Q.J., and Kendal,J-M.
    [2009] Exploring trends in microcrack properties of sedimentary rocks: An audit of dry-core velocity-stress measurements. Geophysics, 74, E193–E203.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hatchell, P., and Bourne, S.
    [2005] Rocks under strain: Strain-induced time-lapse time shifts are observed for depleting reservoirs. The Leading Edge, 24, 1222–1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hawkins, K.
    [2008] Defining the extent of the compacting Elgin reservoir by measuring stress induced Anisotropy. First Break, 26, 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Herwanger, J., Palmer, E., and Schiett, C.R.
    [2007] Anisotropic velocity changes in seismic time-lapse data. 77th SEG Conference, Expanded Abstract, 2883–2887.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Herwanger, J.V.
    , [2008] R we there yet?70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holt, R.M., Fjaer, E., Nes, O-M., and Stenebråten, J.F.
    [2008] Strain Sensitivity of Wave Velocities in Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks. 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 2nd U.S. — Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, San Francisco, June 29– July 2, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Holt, R. M.
    , and Stenebråten [2013]. Controlled laboratory experiments to assess the geomechanical influence of subsurface injection and depletion processes on 4D seismic responses. Geophys. Prosp., 61, 476–488.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones, M. E., Leddra, M. J., Goldsmith, A. S., Edwards, D.
    [1992] The Geomechanical Characteristics of Reservoirs and Reservoir Rocks. UK Health and Safety Executive Offshore Technology Report OTH333.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kudarova, A., Hatchell, P., Brain, J., and MacBeth, C.
    [2016] Offset-dependence of production-related 4D time-shifts: real data examples and modeling. 86th SEG Conference, Expanded Abstract, 5395–5399.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Landrø, M. and Stammeijer, J.
    [2004] Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and travel time changes. Geophysics, 69, 949–957,
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MacBeth, C., and Schuett, H.
    [2007] The stress dependent elastic properties of thermally induced microfractures in aeolian Rotliegend sandstone. Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 323–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Røste, T., A.Stovas, and M.Landro
    [2005] Estimation of layer thickness and velocity changes using 4D prestack seismic data. 67th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, C0 10.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Røste, T., Landro, M., and Hatchell, P.
    [2007] Monitoring overburden layer changes and fault movements from time-lapse seismic data on the Valhall Field. Geophys. J. Int., 170, 1100–1118.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sayers, C. M. and M.Kachanov
    [1995] Microcrack-induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 4149–4156.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sayers, C.M.
    [2006] Sensitivity of time-lapse seismic to reservoir stress path. Geophysical Prospecting, 54, 369–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomsen, L.
    [1986] Weak elastic anisotropy, Geophysics, 51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700483
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700483
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error