Passive seismic interferometry is a relatively new image method and has been applied for many engineering and exploration geophysical investigations. It includes two major methods which are cross-correlation and autocorrelation. The cross-correlation of ambient noise record between two receivers will generate a virtual shot at one receiver location. Autocorrelation of a passive seismic data trace can be considered to yield a conventional zero-offset trace. The autocorrelation of all traces in the passive seismic gather can be considered as a zero-offset section. Both methods could be used in the passive seismic data imaging. In this study, we apply both methods to a passive data set acquired at a well-known geological storage site, Ketzin. We processed the passive data sets by autocorrelation and cross-correlation. We compared the stack sections obtain by autocorrelation, processing of shot gathers got by cross-correlation and active survey. The autocorrelation sections surprisingly have a very good agreement with the active stacked section. The stack sections obtain by processing virtual shot gathers obtained by cross-correlation show some similar features compared with the active stacked section but much worse than the autocorrelation section.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aki, K.
    , 1957. Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves with special reference to microtremors. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute35, 415–456.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Claerbout, J. F.
    , 1968. Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response. Geophysics33, 264–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Draganov, D., CampmanX., ThorbeckeJ., VerdeA.l, and WapenaarK.
    , 2009. Reflection images from ambient seismic noise. Geophysics74, A63.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DraganovD., CampmanX., ThorbeckeJ. and VerdelA.
    , 2013. Seismic exploration-scale velocities and structure from ambient seismic noise (>1 Hz). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth118, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wapenaar, K.
    , 2004. Retrieving the elastodynamic Green’s function of an arbitrary inhomogeneous medium by cross-correlation. Physics Review Letter93, 254301–1–254301–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WapenaarK., DraganovD., SniederR., CampmanX. and VerdelA.
    , 2010a. Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 — Basic principles and application. Geophysics75, A195–A209.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WapenaarK., SlobE., SniederR. and CurtisA.
    , 2010b. Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 2 — Underlying theory and new advances. Geophysics75, A211–A227.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu, Z., Juhlin, C., Gudmundsson, O., Zhang, F., Yang, C., Kashubin, A. and Lüth, S.
    , 2012. Reconstruction of subsurface structure from ambient seismic noise: an example from Ketzin, Germany. Geophysical Journal International189, 1085–1102.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error