1887

Abstract

Summary

Reflection waveform inversion (RWI) provides estimation of low wavenumber model components using reflections generated from a migration/demigration process. The resulting model tends to be a good initial model for FWI. In fact, the optimization images to combine the migration velocity analysis (MVA) objectives (given here by RWI) and the FWI ones. However, RWI may still encounter cycle-skipping at far offsets if the velocity model is highly inaccurate. Similar to MVA, RWI is devoted to focusing reflection data to its true image positions, yet because of the cycle skipping potential we tend to initially use only near offsets. To make the inversion procedure more robust, we introduce the extended image into our RWI. Extending the model perturbations (or image) allows us to better fit the data at larger offsets even with an inaccurate velocity. Thus, we implement a nested approach to optimize the velocity and extended image simultaneously using the objective function of RWI. We slowly reduce the extension, as the image becomes focused, to allow wavepath updates from far offsets to near as a natural progression from long wavelength updates to shorter ones. Applications on synthetic data demonstrate the effectiveness of our method without much additional cost to RWI.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701003
2017-06-12
2021-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkhalifah, T. and Wu, Z.
    [2016] The natural combination of full and image-based waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 64, 19–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Claerbout, J.F.
    [1985] Imaging the Earth’s Interior. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo, Q. and Alkhalifah, T.
    [2016] Elastic Reflection Based Waveform Inversion in Isotropic Media. In: 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hou, J. and Symes, W.W.
    [2015] An approximate inverse to the extended Born modeling operator. GEOPHYSICS, 80(6), R331–R349.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mora, P.
    [1989] Inversion=migration+tomography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 78–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Plessix, R., Roeck, Y.D. and Chavent, G.
    [1995] Automatic and simultaneous migration velocity analysis and waveform inversion of real data using a MBTT/WKB J formulation, 1099–1102.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Plessix, R.E.
    [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Symes, W.W. and Kern, M.
    [1994] Inversion of reflection seismograms by differential semblance analysis: algorithm structure and synthetic examples1. Geophysical Prospecting, 42(6), 565–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, Z. and Alkhalifah, T.
    [2015] Simultaneous inversion of the background velocity and the perturbation in full-waveform inversion. Geophysics, 80(6), R317–R329.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu, S., Wang, D., Chen, F., Zhang, Y. and Lambare, G.
    [2012] Full Waveform Inversion for Reflected Seismic Data. 74th Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC, EAGE, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701003
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error