1887

Abstract

Summary

The ability of the surface wave methods to estimate not only near-surface properties but also implicitly characterize the surface waves, which can be used to improve the ground-roll noise attenuation step in seismic data processing, makes this type of method almost a natural option for time-lapse land surveys. As part of a time-lapse project monitoring CO2 movement within a reservoir in the Powder River Basin in southeastern Montana, USA, we used a surface wave method to estimate time-lapse near-surface velocities from 2-D crooked surveys acquired using three-component seismic nodes and an accelerated-weight-drop seismic source. As was expected, the baseline and monitoring surveys were affected by high levels of coherent and incoherent noise typical of active oil fields. Using a time-offset windowing scheme on individual surface wave events, we were able to focus the ground roll energy recorded in our sparse and irregular acquisition array and estimate near-surface velocity models. We compared these models with near-surface velocity models derived from first-break traveltime tomography. Despite the different resolution of the models, it was possible to confirm the good quality of the velocity models estimated with the surface wave method and identify the geologic formations in the near-surface of the study area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702074
2017-09-03
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beresford-Smith, G. and Rango, R.
    [1989] Suppression of ground roll by windowing in two domains. First Break, 7, (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bluemle, J.P.
    [1998] The coalbed methane potential of North Dakota lignites: North Dakota Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-1, 38 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burnison, S.A., Livers, A.J., Hamling, J.A., Salako, O. and Gorecki, C.D.
    [2016] Design and implementation of scalable, automated, semipermanent seismic arrays for detecting CO2 extent during geologic CO2 injection, 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-13, 14–18 November 2016, Lausanne, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones, I.F.
    [2012] Tutorial: Incorporating near-surface velocity anomalies in pre-stack depth migrations models, First Break, 30 (3).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Livers, A.J., Burnison. S.A., Salako, O., Barajas-Olalde, C., Hamling, J.A. and Gorecki, C.D.
    [2016] Feasibility of the scalable, automated, semi-permanent seismic array (SASSA) to monitor possible carbon dioxide migration. AGU Fall Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Molnar, P.S. and Porter, M.L.
    [1990] Geologic reservoir study of the Bell Creek Field, Carter and Powder River Counties, Montana. Exxon USA Reservoir Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Strobbia, C., Laake, A., Vermeer, P. and Glushchenko, A.
    [2011] Surface waves: use them then lose them. Surface-wave analysis, inversion, and attenuation in land reflection seismic surveying, Near Surface Geophysics, 9, 503–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ThamkeJ.N., LeCain, G.D., Ryter, D.W., SandoR., and LongA.J.
    [2014] Hydrogeologic framework of the uppermost principal aquifer systems in the Williston and Powder River structural basins, United States and Canada Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5047, version 1.1, U.S. Department of the Interior.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. XiaJ., MillerR.D., and Park, C.B.
    , [1999] Estimation of near-surface shear wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves, Geophysics, 64, 691–700.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702074
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702074
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error