1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. IOR 2017 - 19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Foam flooding as an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method can greatly improve Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) injection and Cyclic CO2 injection in the secondary phase of oil production. However, foam flooding suffers from a lack of high efficiency in terms of oil recovery compared with chemical EOR methods. Despite of possibility of generating strong foam in the presence of oil, incremental oil recovery by the foam flooding is limited. Additionally, a noticeable portions of oil recovery by foam flooding are as mixture with a surfactant solutions, which involves the oil separation from emulsion which won’t be economically favorable. To tackle these issues, this paper presents experimental study of a novel alkali-surfactan-t foam(ASF) flooding process as a chemical-foam design to improve immiscible foam flooding. The ASF enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process involved the use of alkali-surfactant solution as a slug and foam as the drive to mobilize and displace the remaining oil after water flooding process. In this study, a blend of two type of anionic surfactant formulations was formulated for slug and drive: IOS, which exhibits low interfacial tension (IFT), AOS which creates strong foam. Prior to the oil recovery experiments, foam mobility reduction behavior at the transient and steady state condition in the absence of oleic phase was investigated. During this, experiments performed using the Bentheimer sandstone cores, pressure-drop measurement aimed to determine foam solutions’ ability to reduce total mobility. X-ray CT images were taken during foam generation to find out the stability of advancing front of foam propagation and to map the gas saturation. Then, proposed ASF strategy for enhanced oil recovery was tested through the co-injection of immiscible nitrogen gas and slug/drive surfactant solutions with three different formulation properties in terms of IFT reduction and foaming strength capability. The performance of this ASF slug/drive chemical formulation was evaluated by a core-flood test on Bentheimer sandstone rock with the aid of X-ray computed tomography. The discovered optimal formulation contains a foaming agent surfactant, a low IFT surfactant, and a co-solvent, which has high foam stability and low IFT (1.6 *10–2mN/m). This co-injection gave higher oil recovery and much less MRF than the same process with only using a foaming agent. Oil displacement experiment revealed that co-injection of gas with a blend of surfactants containing co-solvent can recover a significant amount of oil recovery (33% OOIP) over waterflood.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702311
2017-04-24
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702311
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chabert, M., Souza, D. D., Cochran, J., Delamaide, E., Technologies, I. F. P., & Dwyer, P.
    (2016). A CO 2 Foam Conformance Pilot in US Gulf Coast Region.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Chevallier, E., Tchamba, O., Chabert, M., Bekri, S., Martin, F., & Gautier, S.
    (2015). Foams with Ultra-Low Interfacial Tensions for an Efficient EOR Process in.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Falls, A. H., Hirasaki, G. J., Patzek, T. W., Gauglitz, D. A., Miller, D. D., & Ratulowski, T.
    (1988). Development of a Mechanistic Foam Simulator: The Population Balance and Generation by Snap-Off. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(3), 884–892. http://doi.org/10.2118/14961-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Guo, H., Zitha, P., Faber, R., & Buijse, M.
    (2012). A Novel Alkaline/Surfactant/Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery Process. SPE Journal, 17(4), 19–21. http://doi.org/10.2118/145043-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Kang, W., Liu, S., Meng, L., Cao, D., & Fan, H.
    (2010). A Novel Ultra-low Interfacial Tension Foam Flooding Agent to Enhance Heavy Oil Recovery. Proceedings of SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. http://doi.org/10.2118/129175-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kovscek, A. R., Tadeusz, W. P., & Radke, C. J.
    (1997). Mechanistic Foam Flow Simulation in Heterogeneous and Multidimensional Porous Media. SPE Journal, 2(4), 511–526. http://doi.org/10.2118/39102-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, R. F., Hirasaki, G. J., Miller, C. a, & Masalmeh, S. K.
    (2012). Wettability Alteration and Foam Mobility Control in a Layered , 2D Heterogeneous Sandpack. SPE Journal, (December), 1207–1220. http://doi.org/10.2118/141462-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, R. F., Yan, W., Liu, S., Hirasaki, G. J., Miller, C. A., & Oil, O.
    (2010). Foam Mobility Control for Surfactant Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Journal, 15(November 2009), 20–23. http://doi.org/10.2118/113910-PA
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma, K., Liontas, R., Conn, C. a., Hirasaki, G. J., & Biswal, S. L.
    (2012). Visualization of improved sweep with foam in heterogeneous porous media using microfluidics. Soft Matter, 8(41), 10669. http://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm25833a
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Nguyen, Q. P., Currie, P. K., Buijse, M., & Zitha, P. L. J.
    (2007). Mapping of foam mobility in porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 58(1–2), 119–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.12.007
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Rossen, W. ., & Gauglitz, P.
    . (1990). Percolation Theory of Foam in Porous Media. Spe, 36(8). http://doi.org/10.2118/20239-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Rossen, W. R.
    (1996). “Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery,” in R. K.Prud’homme and S.Khan, ed., Foams: Theory, Measurements and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Schramm, L. L., & Smith, D. H.
    (1996). Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. American Chemical Society (Vol. 10). American Chemical Society. http://doi.org/10.1021/ef950077m
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Simjoo, M., & Nguyen, Q. P.
    (2011). Rheological Transition during Foam Flow in Porous Media.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Srivastava, M., & Nguyen, Q.
    (2010). Application of Gas for Mobility Control in Chemical EOR in Problematic Carbonate Reservoirs. Proceedings of SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. http://doi.org/10.2118/129840-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Szlendak, S. M., Nguyen, N., & Nguyen, Q. P.
    (2013). Laboratory Investigation of Low-Tension- Gas Flooding for Improved Oil Recovery in Tight Formations. SPE Journal, 8–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang, S., Tian, L., Lu, J., Wang, Z., Xie, Y., Yang, X., & Lei, X.
    (2014). A Novel Low Tension Foam Flooding for Improving Post-Chemical-Flood in Shuanghe Oilfield. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.2118/169074-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Tanzil, D., Hirasaki, G. J., & Miller, C. A.
    (2002). Conditions for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media. In SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. http://doi.org/10.2118/75176-MS
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, W., Pan, J., & Guo, M.
    (2010). Mechanisms of oil displacement by ASP-foam and its influencing factors. Petroleum Science, 7(1), 100–105. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-010-0012-1
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yuqiang, P., Dehuang, S., & Shaocheng, X.
    (2008). Experimental study on nitrogen foam flooding to enhance oil recovery in heavy oil reservoir-taking Qinhuangdao 32-6 Oiifield with heavy oil as an example. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 59–61.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702311
Loading
Chemical-foam Design as a Novel Approach Towards Immiscible Foam Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery
Conference Proceedings 2017, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201702311
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702311
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702311
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error