1887

Abstract

Summary

Wellbore instability problems are often complicated and costly to solve and may endanger the success of the complete well construction process. For many years, different wellbore stability models are presented to study the state of stresses around the borehole and finally evaluate its stability or failure under the given circumstances. As the majority of the input parameters to the stability models are subjected to errors and uncertainties, therefore the model output, which is the minimum mud pressure required to prevent from the well collapse, is considered as an uncertain parameter. In this work, a Monte Carlo simulation as a quantitative probabilistic method is performed to assess the effect uncertainties in the input parameters on the performance of poroelastic stability model. Results of the Monte Carlo simulation for the given input parameters show that at mud pressures larger than 38 MPa, the probability of the wellbore stability is more than 90% and accordingly the wellbore collapse occurs with a probability of less than 10%. It also can be concluded that the probability of the well stability does not change significantly at different azimuth angles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800114
2018-04-09
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Manshad, A.K., Jalalifar, H. and Aslannejad, M.
    [2014] Analysis of vertical, horizontal and deviated wellbore stability by analytical and numerical methods. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 4, 359–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Moos, D., Peska, P., Finkbeiner, T. and Zoback, M.
    [2003] Comprehensive wellbore stability analysis utilizing quantitative risk assessment. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 38 (3–4), 97–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mostafavi, V., Aadnoy, B.S. and Hareland, G.
    [2011] Model–based uncertainty assessment of wellbore stability analyses and downhole pressure estimations. 45th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, ARMA11–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tran, M., Abousleiman, Y. and Younane, N.
    [2010] The impacts of failure criteria and geological stress states on sensitivity of parameters in wellbore stability analysis. 44th US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMA10–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Udegbunam, J.E., Aadnøy, B.S. and Fjelde, K.K.
    [2013] Uncertainty evaluation of wellbore stability model predictions. SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, SPE/IADC 166788.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800114
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800114
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error