1887

Abstract

Summary

Finite difference is a popular method that used for seismic wave modelling, but it still suffer from numerical dispersion problem. Stencil is one of finite difference aspect that affect its accuracy, including the dispersion. Cross-rhombus stencil is a new stencil scheme which combine the standard stencil and a diamond-shaped stencil called rhombus stencil. It is proved that it can reduce numerical dispersion in finite difference method and increasing its efficiency. Since it is new scheme, cross-rhombus stencil has a lot of things to be studied. We described basic theory of this stencil scheme and its application to a simple seismic modeling simulation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800368
2018-04-09
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aoi, S. dan Fujihara, H.
    [1999] 3D Finite-difference method using discontinuous grids. Bulletein of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 4, pp, 918–930.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dablain, M.A.
    [1986]. The application of high-order differencing to the scalar wave equation,Geophysics,51,54–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Finkelstein, B. dan Kastner, R.
    , [2007] Finite difference time domain dispersion reduction schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 221, 422–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Holberg, O.
    [1987] Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentiation in large-scale simulation of wave phenomena: Geophysical Prospecting, 35, no. 6,629–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jastram, C. and Behle, A.
    [1992] Acoustic modeling on a grid of vertically varying spacing, Geophys. Prospect., 40, 157–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jastram, C. and Tessmer, E.
    [1994] Elastic modelling on a grid with vertically varying spacing, Geophys. Prospect., 42, 357–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kristek, J., Moczo, P., Irikura, I., Iwata, T. & Sekiguchi, H.
    [1999] The 1995 Kobe mainshock simulated by the 3D finite differences, in The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Vol. 3, pp. 1361–1368
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu,Y. and Sen, M.K.
    [2009] A new time-space domain high-order finite-difference method for the acoustic wave equation, J. Comput. Phys., 228, 8779–8806.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [2013] Time-space domain dispersion-relation-based finite-difference method with arbitrary even-order accuracy for the 2D acoustic wave equation, J. Comput. Phys., 232, 327–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tan, S. and Huang, L.
    [2014a] A staggered-grid finite-difference scheme optimized in the time-space domain for modeling scalar-wave propagation in geophysical problems,J. Comput. Phys.,276,613–634.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. [2014b] An efficient finite-difference method with high-order accuracy in both time and space domains for modelling scalar-wave propagation,Geophys.J.Int.,197,1250–1267.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang.E, Liu, Y., and Sen, M.K.
    [2016] Effective finite-difference modelling methods with 2D acoustic wave equation using a combination of cross and rhombus stencils. Geophysical Journal International Advance.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800368
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800368
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error