1887

Abstract

Summary

Environmentally, marine seismic vibrators offer a safer way to emit acoustic energy into the earth. Even though they might produce a similar sound exposure level (SEL) to a corresponding airgun array, the SEL injury threshold for marine mammals is significantly higher for continuous sounds than it is for impulsive sounds. It is this reduced animal sensitivity, rather than the vibrator’s lower peak pressure, that gives the vibrator its environmental advantage over airguns for marine mammals.

Geophysically, there has always been concern about the marine vibrator’s ability to generate enough energy, especially at the low frequencies. For all pulsating acoustic sources, there is an inherent reduction of output at low frequencies.

It is indeed difficult to generate enough acoustic energy from a marine seismic vibrator array if the energy requirement is to match the spectrum of an airgun array. But airgun arrays typically produce an excess of energy. By configuring the sweep so as to emit only as much energy as is actually needed to produce the required image signal-to-noise ratio we can make marine vibrators viable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800997
2018-06-11
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Halliday, D.H, Laws, R.M. and Garden, M.
    [2015] Signal and noise in a shallow-water ocean-bottom cable survey. 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 120–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kragh, E., Laws, R.M., Hopperstad, J-F., MorganG. and KireevA.
    [2012] Reducing the size of the seismic source with a 4C towed marine streamer. 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Laws, R. M.
    [2012a] Cetacean hearing-damage zones around a seismic source, in A.N.Popper and A.Hawkins (Eds.), The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 730, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012, 473–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2012b] Marine Vibrator Sweeps. United States Paten. US 9547097 B2.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Laws, R.M., Halliday, D.F., Özbek, A. and Hopperstad, J-F.
    [2016] Exploiting the control of phase in marine vibrators. First Break, 34(11) 65–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Laws, R.M., Kragh, E. and Morgan, G.
    [2008] Are seismic sources too loud?70th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Laws, R. and Morice, S.P.
    [1999] Method of seismic surveying, a marine vibrator arrangement, and a method of calculating the depths of seismic sources. United States Paten.US 7257049 B1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. NOAA
    NOAA [2016] Technical Guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal hearing, Underwater Acoustic Thresholds for Onset of Permanent and Temporary Threshold Shifts. NOAA Technical Memorandu. NMFS-OPR-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Southall, B. L., Bowles, A.E., Ellison, W.T., Finneran, J.J., Gentry, R.L., Greene, C.R., Kastak, D., Ketten, D.R., Miller, J.F., Nachtigall, P.E., Richardson, P.E., Thomas, J.A. and Tyack, P.L.
    [2007] Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: Initial scientific recommendations, Aquatic Mammals, 33, 411–522 ISSN 0167-5427.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800997
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800997
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error