1887

Abstract

Summary

Over the last few decades, some of the seawater injection projects in the North Sea have been suffering from reservoir souring problem. The source of this problem has predominantly been the high concentration of sulfate in the seawater. In some research works nitrate treatment has been introduced as a good strategy for reducing reservoir souring, although in a few investigations it has shown to be ineffective. In this research work, a comprehensive investigation is conducted based on available literature and field data in order to illustrate the source of souring and performance of nitrate injection process. It is postulated that seawater does not initiate reservoir souring only by transporting sulfate ions, but also by transporting other essential components such as trace elements, and/or alteration of some parameters like temperature. Additionally, it is argued that nitrate treatment is an effective mitigation measure if a sufficient concentration of nitrate is added to the injection water. The treatment concentration can be defined as the concentration that provides a local minimum concentration of nitrate during the entire production lifetime wherever seawater exists in the chalk reservoir. This local value can be defined as the smallest nitrate concentration at which nitrate mitigation is active.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801357
2018-06-11
2020-07-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kelso, B., Smith, R.V., Laughlin, R.J. and Lennox, S.D.
    , 1997. Dissimilatory nitrate reduction in anaerobic sediments leading to river nitrite accumulation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63(12): 4679–4685.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Larsen, J., Rod, M.H. and Zwolle, S.
    , 2004. Prevention of reservoir souring in the Halfdan field by nitrate injection, CORROSION 2004. NACE International.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ligthelm, D., De Boer, R., Brint, J. and Schulte, W.
    , 1991. Reservoir souring: an analytical model for H2S generation and transportation in an oil reservoir owing to bacterial activity, Offshore Europe. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mitchell, A.F., Skjevrak, I. and Waage, J.
    , 2017. A Re-Evaluation of Reservoir Souring Patterns and Effect of Mitigation in a Mature North Sea Field, SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sunde, E., Thorstenson, T., Lillebo, B.-L. and Bodtker, G.
    , 2004. H2S inhibition by nitrate injection on the Gullfaks field. CORROSION 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sunde, E., Thorstenson, T., Torsvik, T., Vaag, J. and Espedal, M.
    , 1993. Field-related mathematical model to predict and reduce reservoir souring, SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Vigneron, A. et al.
    2017. Succession in the petroleum reservoir microbiome through an oil field production lifecycle. The ISME Journal.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801357
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801357
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error