We apply the logarithmic phase-only inversion to the near-surface data. The near-surface data has issues of the unbalanced amplitudes of traces along offset, discrepancy in amplitude decays between 2D and 3D models, and the static correction related with the weathering zone. These issues often demand proper and intensive preprocessing for the data. On the other hand, since the logarithmic phase-only inversion ignores the amplitude information of the data during the inversion, it can automatically address the issues related with amplitude of traces. We also the estimate source wavelet separately for each shot to alleviate the delays caused by the weathering zone. Even though we do not do any pre-processing for the near-surface data, the logarithmic phase-only inversion provides a convergent result.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bednar, J. B., Shin, C. and Pyun, S.
    [2007] Comparison of waveform inversion, part 2: phase approach. Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 465–475.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi, Y. and Alkhalifah, T.
    [2013] Frequency-domain waveform inversion using the phase derivative. Geophysical Journal International, 195, 1904–1916.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2015] Unwrapped phase inversion with an exponential damping. Geophysics, 80, R251–R264.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shin, C. and Min, D. J.
    [2006] Waveform inversion using a logarithmic wavefield. Geophysics, 71, R31–R42.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error