Accelerating CMA-ES In History Matching Problems Using An Ensemble Of Surrogates With Generation-Based Management

References

1. AWOTUNDE, A. A. & NARANJO, C.
   2014. Well Placement Optimization Constrained to Minimum Well Spacing.SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference.Maracaibo, Venezuela: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BOUZARKOUNA, Z., DING, D. Y. & AUGER, A.
   2012. Well placement optimization with the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy and meta-models.Computational Geosciences, 16, 75–92.
   [Google Scholar]
3. FOROUZANFAR, F., POQUIOMA, W. E. & REYNOLDS, A. C.
   2016. Simultaneous and Sequential Estimation of Optimal Placement and Controls of Wells With a Covariance Matrix Adaptation Algorithm.
   [Google Scholar]
4. HAJIZADEH, Y., CHRISTIE, M. A. & DEMYANOV, V.
   2010. History matching with differential evolution approach; a look at new search strategies.SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition.Barcelona, Spain: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
5. HANSEN, N.
   2006. The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review. In: LOZANO, J. A., LARRAÑAGA, P., INZA, I. & BENGOETXEA, E. (eds.) Towards a New Evolutionary Computation: Advances in the Estimation of Distribution Algorithms.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   [Google Scholar]
6. HANSEN, N. & OSTERMEIER, A.
   2001. Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies.Evolutionary Computation, 9, 159–195.
   [Google Scholar]
7. HE, J., XIE, J., WEN, X.-H. & CHEN, W.
   2015. Improved Proxy For History Matching Using Proxy-for-data Approach And Reduced Order Modeling.SPE Western Regional Meeting.Garden Grove, California, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
   [Google Scholar]
8. JIN, Y.
   2011. Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges.Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1, 61–70.
   [Google Scholar]
9. MASCHIO, C. & SCHIOZER, D. J.
   2014. Bayesian history matching using artificial neural network and Markov Chain Monte Carlo.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 123, 62–71.
   [Google Scholar]
10. MOHAMED, L., CHRISTIE, M. A. & DEMYANOV, V.
    2010. Reservoir Model History Matching with Particle Swarms: Variants Study.SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition.Mumbai, India: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
11. OLIVER, D. S. & CHEN, Y.
    2011. Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review.Computational Geosciences, 15, 185–221.
    [Google Scholar]
12. RAZAVI, S., TOLSON, B. A. & BURN, D. H.
    2012. Review of surrogate modeling in water resources.Water Resources Research, 48.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ROMERO, C. E. & CARTER, J. N.
    2001. Using genetic algorithms for reservoir characterisation.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 31, 113–123.
    [Google Scholar]
14. SAYYAFZADEH, M.
    Uncertainty quantification using a self-supervised surrogate-assisted parallel Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. ECMOR XIV-15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
15. SAYYAFZADEH, M.
    2017. Reducing the computation time of well placement optimisation problems using self-adaptive metamodelling. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 151, 143–158.
    [Google Scholar]
16. SAYYAFZADEH, M., HAGHIGHI, M., BOLOURI, K. & ARJOMAND, E.
    2012a. Reservoir characterisation using artificial bee colony optimisation.APPEA Journal, 115–128.
    [Google Scholar]
17. SAYYAFZADEH, M., HAGHIGHI, M. & CARTER, J. N.
    2012b. Regularization in History Matching Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and Bayesian Framework.SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference.Copenhagen, Denmark: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
18. SCHULZE-RIEGERT, R. W., KROSCHE, M., PAJONK, O. & MUSTAFA, H.
    2009. Data Assimilation Coupled to Evolutionary Algorithms—A Case Example in History Matching.SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference.Abu Dhabi, UAE: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ZUBAREV, D. I.
    2009. Pros and Cons of Applying Proxy-models as a Substitute for Full Reservoir Simulations.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.New Orleans, Louisiana: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]