1887

Abstract

Summary

We present further development of the 2D two-continua model of proppant transport derived from first principles using the lubrication approximation [1]. The model includes effects associated with presence of the slip velocity between particles and fluid, as well the yield stress of carrying fluid. These features are typically missing in standard, effective-medium models of proppant transport, though power-law rheology is often included. Predictions of model [1] have gone through a thorough validation against a set of carefully selected lab data [2].

It is important to stress the presence of a fundamental issue with standard semi-empirical relationships for suspension rheology, which predict singular behavior near the particle packing limit. One possibility to resolve the issue is to introduce an ad-hoc regularization by stepping out from the singularity at a small epsilon to mimic the transition from flowing suspension to Darcy filtration through the packed bed. Clearly, such a regularization is unable to accurately describe the physics for all possible scenarios since the flux has a different dependence on the channel width for Poiseuille and Darcy flows. Alternatively, one may utilize a recently developed suspension flow model [3], in which the issue of singular behavior is resolved by developing the model from first principles. The latter approach is physics-based, self-consistent, and covers the entire range of variation of the particle volume fraction, from dilute through dense to granular pack, and in particular predicts Darcy filtration at the packing limit.

Here, we will present a proppant transport model that accounts for the combined effects of particle jamming due to bridging, dehydration, and transition to close packing, combined with Bingham rheology of the suspension (induced by cross-linking of the polymer-based fracturing fluid, presence of fibers, and suspension rheology itself near the packing limit). We use a unified closure relation for the suspension rheology proposed recently in [3] to cover the whole range of proppant concentration, from dilute suspension, to dense and close packing. Numerical results are given to illustrate the newly introduced effects.

References:

  1. Osiptsov, A.A., 2017. Fluid Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing: a Review. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. V. 156, July 2017, pp. 513–535.
  2. Boronin, S.A., Osiptsov, A.A. and Desroches, J., 2015. Displacement of yield-stress fluids in a fracture. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 76, pp.47–63.
  3. Dontsov, E.V., and Peirce, A.P., 2014. Slurry flow, gravitational settling, and a proppant transport model for hydraulic fractures. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 760, 567–590.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802159
2018-09-03
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adachi, J., Siebrits, E., Peirce, A. and Desroches, J.
    [2007] Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures.Int. J. RockMech. Min. Sci., 44, 739–757.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boronin, S. and Osiptsov, A.A.
    [2010] Two-continua model of suspension flow in a hydraulic fracture. Doklady Physics, 55(4), 199–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boronin, S.A. and Osiptsov, A.A.
    [2014] Effects of particle migration on suspension flow in a hydraulic fracture. Fluid Dynamics, 49(2), 208–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer, F., Guazzelli, Ã. and Pouliquen, O.
    [2011] Unifying suspension and granular rheology.Physical Review Letters, 107(18), 188301.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis, R. and Acrivos, A.
    [1985] Sedimentation of noncolloidal particles at low reynolds numbers.Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 17, 91–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dontsov, E. and Peirce, A.
    [2014] Slurry flow, gravitational settling, and a proppant transport model for hydraulic fractures.J. Fluid Mech., 760, 567–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lecampion, B. and Garagash, D.
    [2014] Confined flow of suspensions modelled by a frictional rheology.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 759, 197–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leighton, D. and Acrivos, A.
    [1987] The shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions.J. Fluid Mech., 181,415–439.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Matas, J.P., Morris, J.F. and Guazzelli, E.
    [2004] Inertial migration of rigid spherical particles in Poiseuille flow.J. Fluid Mech., 515, 171–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Morris, J. and Boulay, F.
    [1999] Curvilinear flows of noncolloidal suspensions: The role of normal stresses.J. Rheol., 43, 1213–1237.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nigmatulin, R.I.
    [1990] Dynamics of multiphase media.CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nott, P.R., Guazzelli, E. and Pouliquen, O.
    [2011] The suspension balance model revisited.Physics of Fluids, 23(4), 043304.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Osiptsov, A.A.
    [2017] Fluid mechanics of hydraulic fracturing: A review.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 156, 513–535.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Segré, G. and Silberberg, A.
    [1962] Behaviour of macroscopic rigid spheres in Poiseuille flow part 2. Experimental results and interpretation.J. FluidMech., 14, 136–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Velikanov, I., Isaev, V., Bannikov, D., Tikhonov, A., Semin, L., Belyakova, L. and Kuznetsov, D.
    [2018] New Fracture Hydrodynamics and In-Situ Kinetics Model Supports Comprehensive Hydraulic Fracture Simulation.In SPE Europec featured at 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers., SPE–190760–MS.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802159
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802159
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error