1887

Abstract

Summary

Model Order Reduction (MOR) aims at accelerating the numerical simulations for solving large-scale dynamical systems that inherently are computationally expensive while preserving the accuracy of the underlying solution. The objective of this paper is to develop a Parametric Model Order Reduction technique for well location optimization problem that requires a large number of high fidelity simulation runs. Reduced order modeling methodologies for well control optimization have reached a good level of maturity, however, MOR for well placement optimization, required during the closed loop field development plan, is unexplored. MOR for well control optimization requires excitation of inputs to train the model, not drastically different from the test schedule, with fixed well configuration (locations). This reduced model is generally not robust to change in the well location, which we consider here as the system parameter.

This calls for Parametric Model Order Reduction (PMOR) where the goal is to generate reduced order models that characterize the system for different parameters i.e. well locations. We propose local parametric reduced order models for new parameters using a Machine Learning (ML) framework that prove to be more accurate than the global methods using snapshots/basis concatenation. Projection based PMOR using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition is implemented here. In this work, we use Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest to predict the surrogate model error at a new well location with previously computed reduced models that help us choose appropriate basis. We also propose qualitative prediction strategy that may be more useful than exact error prediction for well location optimization. To train the neural network, input features are efficiently selected to represent the change in well location which also includes basis dimensions to account for optimal basis dimension at new parameters. The information from snapshots concatenation is added while training the ML models considering the fact that it is a better choice for some parameters.

This methodology applied to a synthetic channelized reservoir demonstrate the workflow to be accurate to obtain a good reduced model for new well locations. Regularized Neural Network show better prediction performance than Random Forest for the cases shown. We show that the entire system can be represented by already existing ROMs from very few well locations. Machine Learning provide promising results to approximate the characteristics of the parametric reduced order models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802235
2018-09-03
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. A.A.Shah, W.Xing, V.Triantafyllidis
    [2017] Reduced order modelling of parameter dependent linear and nonlinear dynamic PDE models, Proceedings of Royal Society A, 473 (2200), 20160809
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amsallem, D., Cortial, J., & Farhat, C.
    [2009] On-Demand CFD-Based Aeroelastic Predictions Using a Database of Reduced-Order Bases and Models.47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, (January), Orlando, Florida
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bao, A., & Gildin, E.
    [2017, May 17] Data-Driven Model Reduction Based on Sparsity-Promoting Methods for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 185514-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beckner, B., Song, X.
    , [1995] Field development planning using simulated annealing — optimal economic well scheduling and placement.Proceedings of the 1995 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,22–25 October 1995, Dallas, Texas
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bengio, Y., Goodfellow, I.J., Courville, A.
    , [2015] Deep learning, MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bittencourt, A., Horne, R.
    , [1997] Reservoir development and design optimization.Proceedings of the 1997 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,5–8 October 1997, San Antonio, Texas
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BreimanL.
    [2001] Random forests. Machine Learning; 45(1):5–32
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cardoso, M. A., & Durlofsky, L. J.
    [2010, June 1] Use of Reduced-Order Modeling Procedures for Production Optimization. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 119057-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi, Y., Amsallem, D., & Farhat, C.
    [2015] Gradient-based Constrained Optimization Using a Database of Linear Reduced-Order Models.arXiv Preprint arXiv:1506.07849, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. David Amsallem and Charbel Farhat
    [2011] An online method for interpolating linear parametric reduced- order models.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 33(5):2169–2198
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FahimForouzanfar, AlbertC. Reynolds, GaomingLi
    . [2012] Optimization of the well locations and completions for vertical and horizontal wells using a derivative-free optimization algorithm, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volumes 86–87: 272–288
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Geuss, M., Panzer, H., & Lohmann, B.
    [2010] On Parametric Model Order Reduction by Matrix Interpolation.European Control Conference (ECC),July 17–19, 58: 3433–3438
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gildin, E., Ghasemi, M., Romanovskay, A., & Efendiev, Y.
    [2013, February 18] Nonlinear Complexity Reduction for Fast Simulation of Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 163618-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gildin, E., Ghasemi, M., Romanovskay, A., and Efendiev, Y.
    [2013] Nonlinear Complexity Reduction for Fast Simulation of Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media.SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. SPE 163618-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gildin, Eduardo & Ghasemi, Mohammadreza
    . [2014] A New Model Reduction Technique Applied to Reservoir Simulation. 14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery 2014, ECMOR 2014.10.3997/2214‑4609.20141820
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141820 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hesthaven, J. S., Stamm, B., & Zhang, S.
    [2014] Efficient greedy algorithms for high-dimensional parameter spaces with applications to empirical interpolation and reduced basis methods.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 48(1), 259–283
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jansen, J.-D., Brouwer, R., & Douma, S. G.
    [2009, January 1] Closed Loop Reservoir Management. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/119098‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/119098-MS [Google Scholar]
  18. Kohavi, R., & John, G. H.
    [1997] Wrappers for feature subset selection.Artificial Intelligence, 97(1–2), 273–324
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Moosavi, Azam & Stefanescu, Razvan & Sandu, Adrian
    . [2017] Multivariate predictions of local reduced-order-model errors and dimensions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering:1–22
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sarma, P., Chen, W.H.
    , [2008] Efficient well placement optimization with gradient-based algorithm and adjoint models, SPE, 112257.Proceedings of the 2008 SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shirangi, M. G., & Durlofsky, L. J.
    [2015, October 1] Closed-Loop Field Development Under Uncertainty by Use of Optimization With Sample Validation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 173219-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sorek, N., Zalavadia, H., & Gildin, E.
    [2017, February 20] Model Order Reduction and Control Polynomial Approximation for Well-Control Production Optimization. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 182652-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan, X., Gildin, E., Trehan, S., Yang, Y., & Hoda, N.
    [2017, February 20] Trajectory-Based DEIM TDEIM Model Reduction Applied to Reservoir Simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 182600-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Trehan, S., and Durlofsky, L. J.
    [2016] Trajectory Piecewise Quadratic Reduced-Order Model for Subsurface Flow, with Application to PDE-Constrained Optimization.Journal of Computational Physics326 (December): 446–73
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Trehan, Sumeet & Carlberg, Kevin & J.Durlofsky, Louis
    . [2017] Error modeling for surrogates of dynamical systems using machine learning: Machine-learning-based error model for surrogates of dynamical systems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 10.1002/nme.5583.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Doren, J. F. M., Markovinovic, R. and Jansen, J.-D.
    [2006] Reduced-Order Optimal Control of Water Flooding Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition.Computational Geosciences10 (1): 137–58
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802235
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802235
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error