1887

Abstract

Summary

Time-lapse seismic data has been widely used for the detailed reservoir characterization, and data assimilation algorithms are commonly used for petroleum reservoir history matching of production data. However, hardly any seismic data has been integrated into the reservoir inverse modeling workflow, due to the large data size, finer gridding, and especially the scarcity in time of the seismic data. Popular ensemble-based reservoir inverse modeling methods such as ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) also face the problems of high computational cost due to the storage of the intermediate variables, restarting the reservoir simulating process and the inconsistency of the full-step and step-wise simulations. The intrinsic sequential data assimilations characteristics of the EnKF set obstacles to assimilate 4D seismic data. The alternative method can be the ensemble smoother (ES), which is an ensemble based method for data assimilation. The ES is based on a Bayesian updating scheme of the reservoir model to match the production history and improve the production forecast. To improve the algorithm convergence, a multiple data assimilation (MDA) method was proposed by .

The algorithm we used is called ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ESMDA), we modified the ESMDA to integrate the geophysical data, and created the new workflow to history match both the production and geophysical data. The available production data is well measurements, including oil production rate, well water cut and bottom-hole pressure, as well as time-lapse geophysical data, including P-wave impedance. In this paper, we first formulated the mathematical descriptions of ESMDA, we then down-scaled the seismic data, and modified the data assimilation algorithms, illustrated the history matching workflow for both production and geophysical data, finally, we showed how it works with a case study on a water flooding operation in a synthetic reservoir. In comparison, we also showed the history matching only on the production data, which yields an inferior results than the one matches both production and seismic data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802284
2018-09-03
2020-08-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aanonsen, S., G.Nævdal, D.Oliver, A.Reynolds, B.Vall‘es
    [2009] The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engi-neering. a review: SPE Journal, 14, 393–412. (SPE-117274-PA).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhakta, T., Luo, X., Nævdal, G.
    [2016] Ensemble based 4D seismic history matching using a sparse representation of AVA data.SEG International Exposition and 86th Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, 16–21 Oct. 2016
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Y., and D.Oliver
    [2013] Levenberg-Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history match-ing and uncertainty quantification.Computational Geosciences, 17, no. 4, 689–703.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DavidLumley, DanAdams, MarkMeadows, SteveCole, RayErgas
    [2003] 4D seismic pressure-saturation inversion at Gullfaks field, Norway.First break, Vol. 21, Sept. 2003
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Emerick, A. A., A. C.Reynolds
    [2012a] Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation.Computers & Geosciences, 55, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2012b] History matching time-lapse seismic data using the ensemble Kalman filter with multiple data assimilations.Computational Geosciences, 16, no. 3, 639–659
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Emerick, A. A., A. C.Reynolds, et al.
    [2013] History-matching production and seismic data in a real field case using the ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers. (SPE-163675-MS). 10.2118/163675‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/163675-MS [Google Scholar]
  8. Evensen, G., and P. J.van Leeuwen
    [2000] An ensemble Kalman smoother for nonlinear dynamics.Monthly Weather Review, 128, no. 6, 1852–1867
    [Google Scholar]
  9. EvgenyTolstukhin, BjarneLyngnes, Hari H.Sudan
    [2012] Ekofisk 4D Seismic-Seismic History Matching Workflow.EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europec, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4–7 June2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gu, Y., and D.Oliver
    [2007] An iterative ensemble Kalman filter for multiphase fluid flow data assimilation.SPE Journal, 12, 438–446. (SPE-108438-PA).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. K.-A.Lie, S.Krogstad, I. S.Ligaarden, J. R.Natvig, H. M.Nilsen, B.Skaflestad
    [2012] Open source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids. Comput. Geosci., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 297–322, 2012
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, G., A.Reynolds
    [2009] Iterative ensemble Kalman filters for data assimilation.SPE Journal, 14, 496–505. (SPE-109808-PA).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo, X., A.Stordal, R.Lorentzen, G.Nævdal
    [2015] Iterative ensemble smoother as an approximate solution to a regularized minimum-average-cost problem: theory and applications. SPE Journal, 20, 962–982. (SPE-176023-PA).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nævdal, G., L. M.Johnsen, S. I.Aanonsen, E. H.Vefring, et al.
    [2005] Reservoir monitoring and continuous model updating using ensemble Kalman filter.SPE journal, 10, 66–74. (SPE-84372-PA).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ReidarHelland, KjetilFestervoll, LarsKristian Stronen, ElOuair Youness
    [2008] Successful IOR implementation at the Gullfaks Field. 19th World Petroleum Congress, Spain2008 Forum 2
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rommelse, J.
    [2009] Data assimilation in reservoir management.Ph.D. thesis, echnical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Skjervheim, J., Evensen, G.
    [2011] An Ensemble Smoother for Assisted History Matching.SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Woodlands, Texas, USA, 21–23 Feb. 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Talukdar, S., Instefjord, R.
    [2008] Reservoir management of the Gullfaks Main Field.SPE Europec/EAG Conference, Rome, Ital, 9–12 June 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tarantola, A.
    [2005] Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Leeuwen, P. J., and G.Evensen
    [1996] Data assimilation and inverse methods in terms of a probabilistic formulation.Monthly Weather Review, 124, no. 12, 2898–2913.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Walsh, J. J., Manzocchi, T.
    [2002] SAIGUP Project – Impact of Geological Uncertainties on Production from Clastic Reservoirs, 64th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 27–30 May 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802284
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802284
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error