1887

Abstract

Summary

introduced a particularly simple wavelet based semiautomatic interpretation method. When applied to magnetic data the wavelets were based on horizontal derivatives of the first order analytic signal amplitude of the response from different sources, such as dykes and contacts. The wavelets were not applied to the data itself, but to the horizontal derivatives of its first order analytic signal amplitude. While the method worked well, the use of second order derivatives made it sensitive to noise. This abstract introduces several improvements to the original methodology, with the aim of increasing its robustness to noise, namely

  1. Use wavelets based on derivatives of the zero order analytic signal amplitude
  2. Use wavelets based on the Hilbert transform of the analytic signal amplitude of different orders
  3. Application of a sharpening technique to improve the response of the transform
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802701
2018-09-09
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baniamerian, J., Fedi, M., and Oskooi, B.
    , 2016. Compact Depth from Extreme Points: A tool for fast potential field imaging. Geophysical Prospecting64(5). DOI 10.1111/1365‑2478.12365
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12365 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boschetti, F., Hornby, P., and Horowitz, F.G.
    , 2001. Wavelet based inversion of gravity data. Exploration Geophysics32(1), 48–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper, G.R.J.
    , 2006. Interpreting potential field data using continuous wavelet transforms of their horizontal derivatives. Computers & Geosciences32(7), 984–992.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fedi, M., and Quarta, T.
    , 1998. Wavelet analysis for the regional-residual and local separation of potential field anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting46, 507–525.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Leblanc, G.E., and Morris, W.A.
    2001. Denoising of aeromagnetic data via the wavelet transform. Geophysics66, 1793–1804.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. de Oliveira Lyrio, J.C.S., Tenorio, L., and Li, Y.
    , 2004. Efficient automatic denoising of gravity gradiometry data. Geophysics69(3), 772–782.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mallat, S.
    , 1998. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, New York, 577p.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Martelet, G., Sailhac, P., Moreau, F., and Diament, M.
    , 2001. Characterization of geological boundaries using 1-D wavelet transform on gravity data: Theory and application to the Himalayas. Geophysics66, 1116–1129.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moreau, F., Gilbert, D., Holschneider, M., and Saracco, G.
    , 1999. Identification of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Basic theory. Journal of Geophysical Research104(B3), 5003–5013.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ridsdill-Smith, T. A., and Dentith, M. C.
    , 1999. The wavelet transform in aeromagnetic processing. Geophysics64, 1003–1013.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sailhac, P., Galdeano, A., Gibert, D., Moreau, F., and Delor, C.
    , 2000. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Complex wavelets and application to aeromagnetic profiles in French Guiana. Journal of Geophysical Research105, 19455–19475.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomson, D.T.
    , 1982. Euldph: A new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47(1), 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Valee, M.A., Keating, P., Smith, R.S., and St-Hilaire, C.
    , 2004. Estimating depth and model type using the continuous wavelet transform of magnetic data. Geophysics69, 191–199.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802701
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802701
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error