Large scale CCS is crucial to reduce the cost associated with minimizing climate change. Energy system models should thus include CCS at regional or global scale with a proper evaluation of pressure limitations and injectivity, which are currently ignored. To this aim, the use of simplified analytical solutions is highly useful because they provide fast evaluation of pressure and plume evolution without the computational costs of the numerical models. Application of these solutions to assess storage capacity has been extended to cases of multiple well injection. In these cases, the pressure build-up is evaluated as the superposition of the analytical solutions for pressure associated with each individual well. In this study we investigate the validity of the superposition procedure, given the non-linearity of the multiphase flow. We quantify the error associated with the application of superposition to estimate reservoir pressurisation in different scenarios of.multi-site CO2 injection in a large regional aquifer. We find that the error associated with the adoption of this procedure increases with time and with the number of wells in proportion to the area invaded by CO2 in the reservoir.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Azizi, E. & Cinar, Y.
    , 2013. Approximate Analytical Solutions for CO2 Injectivity into Saline Formations. SPE Reservoir Eval. & Eng. Journal, 16(2), pp. 123–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dentz, M., & Tartakovsky, D. M
    . 2009. Abrupt-interface solution for carbon dioxide injection into porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 79(1), 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ghaderi, S. M., Keith, D. W., & Leonenko, Y.
    2009. Feasibility of injecting large volumes of CO2 into aquifers. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 3113–3120.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Joshi, A., Gangadharan, S. & Leonenko, Y.
    , 2016. Modelling of pressure evolution during multiple well injection of CO2 in saline aquifers. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Volume 36, pp. 1070–1079
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mathias, S., Hardisty, P., Trudell, M. & Zimmerman, R.
    , 2009. Approximate Solutions for Pressure Buildup During CO2 Injection in Brine Aquifers. Transp Porous Med, 79(2), pp. 265–284
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mathias, S. A., de Miguel, G. J. G. M., Thatcher, K. E., & Zimmerman, R. W.
    2011. Pressure buildup during CO2 injection into a closed brine aquifer. Transport in porous media, 89(3), 383–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nordbotten, J.M., Celia, M.A. & Bachu, S.
    , 2005. Injection and Storage of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers: Analytical Solution for CO2 Plume Evolution During Injection. Transp Porous Media, Volume 58, p. 339–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pye, S., Li, F.G., Price, J., Fais, B.
    , 2017. Achieving net-zero emissions through the reframing of UK national targets in the post-Paris Agreement era. Nat. Energy2, 17024
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error