1887

Abstract

Summary

Given the recognized importance of the natural fractures in the development of unconventional reservoirs, the sparse statistics created by the lack of cores and image logs requires practical engineering approaches and solutions. Among these solutions is the use of a continuous fracture model that uses a representative volume to describe the fracture density that can be estimated from seismic and surface drilling data. This approach leads to a quantitative use of these natural fractures and their interaction with hydraulic fracture using a robust geomechanical simulation able to predict microseismicty thus validating both the used natural fracture model and the geomechanical modelling approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900334
2019-04-28
2020-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aimene, Y., Ouenes, A.
    (2015) Geomechanical modeling of hydraulic fractures interacting with natural fractures — Validation with microseismic data and tracer data from the Marcellus and Eagle Ford. Interpretation, 3(3), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellenberg, J.
    (2015), How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking, Penguin Books; Reprint edition (May 26, 2015). ISBN-10: 9780143127536.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lorenz, J.C.
    , 1992, Well-bore geometries for optimum fracture characterization and drainage. West Texas Geological Society Bulletin, 32, 5–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lorenz, C. L., J.Sterling, D.Schechter, C.Whigham, and J.Jensen
    , 2002, Natural fractures in the Spraberry Formation, Midland basin, Texas: The effects of mechanical stratigraphy on fracture variability and reservoir behavior: AAPG Bulletin, 86, 505524.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lorenz, J.C., Cooper, S.P.
    (2017), Atlas of Natural and Induced Fractures in Core, DOI:10.1002/9781119160014
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119160014 [Google Scholar]
  6. Maity, D.
    , 2018. Microseismicity Analysis for HFTS Pad and Correlation With Completion Parameters. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. doi:10.15530/URTEC‑2018‑2902355.
    https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2018-2902355 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ouenes, A., Weiss, W. W., Sultan, A. J., Gum, T., & Brooks, L. C.
    , 1994. A New Method To Characterize Fractured Reservoirs: Applications to Infill Drilling. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/27799‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/27799-MS [Google Scholar]
  8. Ouenes, A., Richardson, S., & Weiss, W. W.
    , 1995. Fractured Reservoir Characterization and Performance Forecasting Using Geomechanics and Artificial Intelligence. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/30572‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/30572-MS [Google Scholar]
  9. Ouenes, A., Umholtz, N., Aimene, Y.
    , 2015, 2016, Using geomechanical modeling to quantify the impact of natural fractures on well performance and microseismicity: Application to the Wolfcamp, Permian Basin, Reagan County, Texas, URTeC doi:10.15530/URTEC‑2015‑2173459 and Interpretation, May 2016, Vol. 4, No 2. doi: 10.1190/INT‑2015‑0134.1.
    https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2173459 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ouenes, A., Paryani, M., Aimene, Y., Hammerquist, C., Bachir, A.
    , 2019, Surface Drilling Data for Constrained Hydraulic Fracturing and Fast Reservoir Simulation of Unconventional Wells [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84759. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/surface-drilling-data-for-constrained-hydraulic-fracturing-and-fast-reservoir-simulation-of-unconven
    https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.84759 [Google Scholar]
  11. Shrivastava, K., Hwang, J., & Sharma, M.
    , 2018. Formation of Complex Fracture Networks in the Wolfcamp Shale: Calibrating Model Predictions with Core Measurements from the Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/191630‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/191630-MS [Google Scholar]
  12. Whitaker, S.
    , 1986, Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy's law. Transport in Porous Media. 1: 3–25. doi:10.1007/BF01036523
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01036523 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900334
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900334
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error