1887

Abstract

Summary

Depletion or injection into a reservoir implies stress and strain changes in the reservoir and its surroundings. This may lead to measurable time-shifts for seismic waves propagating in the subsurface. We have measured multidirectional ultrasonic P-wave velocity changes for three different field shale cores, each probed with four different stress paths (i.e. different ratios between the horizontal and the vertical stress change), to systematically quantify the time-shifts for overburden shales with respect to ray angle (offset). The laboratory data show that for a given offset, the time-shifts are stress path dependent, where the isotropic stress path is associated with larger time-shifts as compared to the constant mean stress path or the triaxial stress path. Generally, the time-shifts are largest for zero offset (propagation normal to the bedding) and are decreasing for increasing offsets. The constant mean stress path has the most significant decrease of time-shifts with offset. By utilizing pre-stack seismic offset data, such controlled laboratory experiments can be used to constrain the inversion of 4D seismic data to quantify the stress and strain changes due to production. This may have important implications for improved recovery and safety, particularly in mature fields.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900804
2019-06-03
2020-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakk, A., Stenebråten, J.F., Lozovyi, S., Bauer, A., Sønstebø, E.F., Fjær, E., Bhuiyan, M.H., Chakraborty, S. and Holt, R.M.
    [2018] Static and dynamic characterization of a deep overburden shale. 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We-A11-09.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Calvert, M.A., Cherrett, A.J., Micksch, U., Bourgeois, F.G. and Calvert, A.S.
    [2018] New time lapse seismic attribute linking 4D and geomechanics. 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Tu-A15-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Gennaro, S., Onaisi, A., Grandi, A., Ben-Brahim, L. and Neillo, V.
    [2008] 4D reservoir geomechanics: a case study from the HP/HT reservoirs of the Elgin and Franklin fields. First Break, 26(12), 53–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hall, S.A., MacBethC., BarkvedO. I. and Wild, P.
    [2002] Time-lapse seismic monitoring of compaction and subsidence at Valhall through cross-matching and interpreted warping of 3D streamer and OBC data. 72nd SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1696–1699.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatchell, P. and Bourne, S.
    [2005] Rocks under strain: Strain-induced time-lapse time shifts are observed for depleting reservoirs. The Leading Edge, 24, 1222–1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawkins, K.
    [2008] Defining the extent of the compacting Elgin reservoir by measuring stress-induced anisotropy. First Break, 26(10), 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Herwanger, J.V. and Horne, S.A.
    [2009] Linking reservoir geomechanics and time-lapse seismics: Predicting anisotropic velocity changes and seismic attributes. Geophysics, 74, W13–W33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Herwanger, J., Palmer, E. and Schiøtt, C.R.
    [2007] Anisotropic velocity changes in seismic time-lapse data. 77th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2883–2887.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Holt, R.M., Bauer, A. and Bakk, A.
    [2018] Stress-path-dependent velocities in shales: Impact on 4D seismic interpretation. Geophysics, 83, MR353-MR367.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Landrø, M. and Stammeijer, J.
    [2004] Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and traveltime changes. Geophysics, 69, 949–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MacBeth, C., Kudarova, A. and Hatchell, P.J.
    [2018] A semi-empirical model of strain sensitivity for 4D seismic interpretation. Geophys. Prospect., 66, 1327–1348.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Morita, N. and G.-F.Fuh
    [2009] Parametric analysis of stress reduction in the cap rock above compacting reservoirs. SPE Drilling & Completion, 24, 659–670.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Prioul, R., Bakulin, A. and Bakulin, V.
    [2004] Nonlinear rock physics model for estimation of 3D subsurface stress in anisotropic formations: Theory and laboratory verification. Geophysics, 69, 415– 425.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Røste, T., Dybvik, O.P. and Søreide, O.K.
    [2015] Overburden 4D time shifts induced by reservoir compaction at Snorre field. The Leading Edge, 34, 1366–1374.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Røste, T., Stovas, A. and Landrø, M.
    [2005] Estimation of layer thickness and velocity changes using 4D prestack seismic data. 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, C010.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Szewczyk, D, Bauer, A. and Holt, R.M.
    [2016] Stress-dependent elastic properties of shales - laboratory experiments at seismic and ultrasonic frequencies. Geophys. J. Int., 212, 189–210.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900804
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900804
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error