1887

Abstract

Summary

Normal moveout (NMO) correction is an essential step to eliminate the influence of offsets on the traveltime of reflections for the purpose of subsequent stacking or AVO analysis. The far-offset wide-angle reflections are used in improving the accuracy or creating initial models for inversion, and so on, however, which are often subjected to muting to suppress NMO stretching and distortion, resulting in a loss of valuable information. To avoid stretching and deal with the interfering or intersecting event, we propose a structure-constrained NMO correction method based on sparse inversion, which corrects the sparse reflectivity gather with offset-dependent traveltime different from conventional sample-by-sample NMO correction. Firstly, in order to implement inversion-based reflectivity NMO correction, we introduce an inverse NMO operator and use the known or estimated time invariant wavelets to build the relationship between the uncorrected CMP gather and the flattened reflectivity gather. Then, to obtain the stable sparse flattened reflectivity gather even at interfering or intersecting events, we impose the structural sparsity operator and the lateral L2-norm regularized constraint on the objective function. Finally, synthetic and real data examples illustrate the proposed method can provide significantly flattened, stretch-free and high-quality NMO corrected result.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901385
2019-06-03
2020-08-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buchholtz, H.
    [1972] A note on signal distortion due to dynamic (NMO) correction: Geophysical Prospecting, 20, no. 2, 395–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Claerbout, J. F.
    [1992] Earth Soundings Analysis, Processing versus Inversion: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dix, C. H.
    [1955] Seismic velocities from surface measurements.Geophysics, 20, no. 1, 68–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Robinson, E. A., and TreitelS.
    [1980] Geophysical signal analysis: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rupert, G. B., and Chun, J. H.
    [1975] The block move sum normal moveout correction.Geophysics, 40, no. 1, 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Taner, M. T., and Koehler, F.
    [1969] Velocity spectra-digital computer derivation applications of velocity functions.Geophysics, 34, no. 6, 859–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yuan, S. Y., Wang, S. X., Luo, C. M., and Wang, T. Y.
    [2018] Inversion-based 3-D seismic denoising for exploring spatial edges and spatio-temporal signal redundancy.IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15, no. 11, 1682–1686.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yuan, S. Y., Wang, S. X., Ma, M., Ji, Y. Z., and Deng, L.
    [2017] Sparse Bayesian learning-based time-variant deconvolution: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55, no. 11, 6182–6194.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, B., Zhang, K., Guo, S., and Marfurt, K. J.
    [2013] Nonstretching NMO correction of prestack time-migrated gathers using a matching-pursuit algorithm: Geophysics, 78, no. 1, U9–U18.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901385
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901385
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error