We propose an electrical resistivity imaging method from electromagnetic data based on the ever-evolving machine learning technique. This method is applied to delineate salt body that is essential for hydrocarbon reservoir imaging and uses a fully convolutional network to preserve the spatial information of the input data. The proposed network is trained using synthetic data and shows impressive results when applied to unseen test data.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abadi, M. et al.
    [2016] TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jia, Y. and Ma, J.
    [2017] What can machine learning do for seismic data processing? An interpolation application. Geophysics, 82(3), V163–V177.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kadu, A., van Leeuwen, T. and Mulder, W. A.
    [2017] Salt reconstruction in full-waveform inversion with a parametric level-set method. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 3(2), 305–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kang, S., Seol, S. J. and Byun, J.
    [2012] A feasibility study of CO2 sequestration monitoring using the mCSEM method at a deep brine aquifer in a shallow sea. Geophysics, 77(2), E117–E126.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Long, J., Shelhamer, E. and Darrell, T.
    [2015] Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mckay, A., Mattsson, J. and Du, Z.
    [2015] Towed streamer EM—Reliable recovery of sub-surface resistivity. First Break, 33(4), 75–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oh, S., Noh, K., Yoon, D., Seol, S. J. and Byun, J.
    [2018] Salt delineation from electromagnetic data using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, early access.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ronneberger, O. and Fischer, P. and Brox, T.
    [2015] U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Waldeland, A. U., Jensen, A. C., Gelius, L.-J. and Solberg, A. H. S.
    [2018] Convolutional neural networks for automated seismic interpretation. The Leading Edge, 37(7), 529–537.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, W., Yang, F. and Ma, J.
    [2018] Automatic salt detection with machine learning. 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, TuP601.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, Z., Di, H., Shafiq, M. A., Alaudah, Y. and AlRegib, G.
    [2018] Successful leveraging of image processing and machine learning in seismic structural interpretation: A review. The Leading Edge, 37(6), 451–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon, D., Zhdanov, M. S., Mattsson, J., Cai, H. and Gribenko, A.
    [2016] A hybrid finite-difference and integral-equation method for modeling and inversion of marine controlled-source electromagnetic data. Geophysics, 81(5), E323–E336.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yuan, S., Liu, J., Wang, S., Wang, T. and Shi, P.
    [2018] Seismic waveform classification and first-break picking using convolution neural networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15(2), 272–276.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error