1887

Abstract

Summary

Extracting key horizons from seismic data is an important element of the seismic interpretation workflow. Numerous computer-assisted horizon extraction methods exist, but they are typically sensitive to structural and stratigraphic discontinuities and have difficulties to extract non-coherent dislocated horizons. We propose a new data-driven seismic interpretation workflow to extract dislocated seismic horizons from complex 3D seismic data. The proposed workflow combines two separate methods: identification of stratigraphic sequences using unsupervised machine learning, and automatic correlation and extraction of seismic horizons using non-local trace matching. We use unsupervised machine learning to automatically identify and label stratigraphic sequences, and non-local dynamic time warping to iteratively track and extract seismic horizons from each of the identified sequences, constrained by the sequence boundaries. This workflow allows us to interpret structurally and stratigraphically complex seismic volumes completely automatically, and it require no interpretive experience or geological knowledge.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901509
2019-06-03
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Campello, R., Moulavi, D., Sander, J.
    , 2013, Density-Based Clustering Based on Hierarchical Density Estimates. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 160–72. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. EsterM., KriegelH.-P., SanderJ., XuX.
    , 1996, A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise, 2nd Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland, OR, AAAI Press, p 226–231
    [Google Scholar]
  3. He, D. C., Wang, L.
    , 1990, Texture Unit, Texture Spectrum, And Texture Analysis, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 28, pp. 509 – 512.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lomask, J., Guitton, A., Fomel, S., Claerbout, J., Valenciano, A.A
    , 2006. Flattening without picking. Geophysics71, P13–P20. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2210848
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sakoe, H., Chiba, S.
    , 1978. Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING ASSP-26, 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stark, T.J
    , 2005. Generating a seismic Wheeler volume. Presented at the 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 782–785.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , 2003. Unwrapping instantaneous phase to generate a relative geologic time volume. Presented at the 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1707–1710.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, X., Fomel, S.
    , 2018. Least-squares horizons with local slopes and multigrid correlations. Geophysics83, IM29–IM40. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0830.1
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu, X., Hale, D.
    , 2013. Extracting horizons and sequence boundaries from 3D seismic images. Presented at the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, X., Zhong, G.
    , 2012. Generating a relative geologic time volume by 3D graph-cut phase unwrapping method with horizon and unconformity constraints. Geophysics77, O21–O34.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901509
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901509
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error