1887

Abstract

Summary

During the Late Paleozoic, the Barents Sea was at the edge of the Pangea Supercontinent, recording major climatic and oceanographic changes in the large Panthalassa Ocean ( ). These changes preclude major tectonic events in the Urals and further south, in Central Europe ( ; Glørstad‐Clark et al., 2010). This paper focuses on a region located ~150 km to the North of Finnmark, in Northern Norway ( Fig. 1 ). It relates, for the first time, how the geometry and distribution of Carboniferous and Permian mounds relates to vertical movements of the Samson Dome, and adjacent platform areas ( Fig. 1a ). In essence, this work will demonstrated Samson Dome area presented a much different palaeogeography in the Carboniferous and Permian from the present day, hinting at the presence of sheltered (shallow) platform areas away from the salt structures that are imaged, on seismic data, at present ( Figs. 1b and 1c ). The identification of such sheltered areas suggests that either: a) older salt structures (pillows, ridges) existed away from the Samson Dome and salt was subsequently withdrawn from below them during the Mesozoic, or b) important vertical movements in the Mesozoic led to the subsidence of Paleozoic carbonate platforms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901559
2019-06-03
2020-07-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alves, T.M
    . [2016] Polygonal mounds in the Barents Sea reveal sustained organic productivity towards the P–T boundary. Terra Nova, 28, 50–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Colpaert, A., Pickard, N., Mienert, J., Henriksen, L.B., Rafaelsen, B. and Andreassen, K.
    [2007] 3D seismic analysis of an Upper Palaeozoic carbonate succession of the Eastern Finnmark Platform area, Norwegian Barents Sea. Sedimentary Geology, 197, 79–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ehrenberg, S.N., Nielsen, E.B., Svånå, T.A. and Stemmerik, L
    . [1998] Depositional evolution of the Finnmark carbonate platform, Barents Sea: results from wells 7128/6‐1 and 7128/4‐1. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 78, 185–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehrenberg, S.N., McArthur, J.M. and Thirlwall, M.F
    . [2010] Strontium isotope dating of spiculitic Permian strata from Spitsbergen outcrops and Barents Sea well‐cores. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 33, 247–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elvebakk, G., Hunt, D.W. and Stemmerik, L.
    [2002] From isolated build‐ups to build‐up mosaics: 3D seismic sheds new light on upper Carboniferous‐Permian fault controlled carbonate build‐ups, Norwegian Barents Sea. Sedimentary Geology, 152, 7–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Faleide, J.I., Vågnes, E. and Gudlaugsson, S.T
    . [1993] Late Mesozoic‐Cenozoic evolution of the south‐western Barents Sea in a regional rift‐shear tectonic setting. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 3, 186–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Glørstad‐Clark, E., Faleide, J.I., Lundschien, B.A. and Nystuen, J.P
    . [2010] Triassic seismic sequence stratigraphy and paleogeography of the western Barents Sea area. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 1448–1475.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gudlaugsson, S.T., Faleide, J.I., Johansen, S.E. and Breivik, A.J
    . [1998] Late Palaeozoic structural development of the South‐western Barents Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 15, 73–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shulgin, A., Mjelde, R., Faleide, J.I., Hoy, T., Flueh, E. and Thybo, H
    . [2018] The crustal structure in the transition zone between the western and eastern Barents Sea. Geophysical Journal International, 214, 315–330.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901559
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901559
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error