1887

Abstract

Summary

Present industry 4D workflows normally use the co-processing and imaging of baseline and monitor surveys with the same depth-interval velocity model. Standard practice is to re-align the migrated offset or angle stacks vintages with dynamic 1-D Warping and extract amplitude differences for 4D interpretation.

A weakness is that in complex geology dominated by laterally-variant anisotropic overburden and steep-dipping reservoirs in proximity of salt or sub-salt, the production-related 4D changes are not accurately described and compensated for during the generation of post-stack 4D attributes. The relationship between dynamic warping time-shifts and velocity changes relies on a 1D assumption of wave propagation. This leads to major uncertainty and errors in magnitude, shape and spatial location of inverted 4D velocity perturbations that could severely affect the interpretation.

We challenge this prevailing dogma, and motivated to integrate rigorous physics we investigate 4D velocity-change inversions in pre-stack domain where the production-related time-shifts and amplitude effects should better differentiate towards robust assessment of overburden structural deformation and pressure/saturation reservoir changes.

We demonstrate it with realistic 3D elastic synthetic and field data examples, and emphasize the importance of tailored 4D processing and inversion workflows to mitigate risk and improve reservoir management decisions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901583
2019-06-03
2020-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Audebert, F. and Agut, C
    . [2014] Making time-domain “warping” applicable to the retrieval of 4D perturbations in depth imaging contexts. 84th Annual Meeting SEG, Denver, USA, Expanded Abstracts33, pp. 4873–4877.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Edgar, J. and Mastio, N.
    , [2017] Time-lapse velocity change tomography. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Paris, France, 12–15 June, ThA114.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin, Y. and Huang, L
    . [2015] Acoustic and Elastic-waveform inversion using a modified total-variation regularization scheme. Geophys. J. Int. 200(1), pp. 489–502.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Oppert, S., Stefani, J., Eakin, D., Halpert, A., Herwanger, J.V., Bottrill, A., Popov, P., Tan, L., Artus, V., Oristaglio, M
    . [2017] Virtual time-lapse seismic monitoring using fully coupled flow and geomechanical simulations. The Leading Edge, 36(9), 750, pp. 752–768.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. R.-E.Plessix, Michelet, S., Rynja, H., Kuehl, H., Perkins, C., de Maag, J. W., Hatchell, P.
    [2010] Some 3D applications of full waveform inversion. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June, WS06 08.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thore, P., de Verdiere, C., McManus, E
    . [2012] Estimation of 4D signal in complex media, A fast track approach. 82ndAnnual Meeting SEG, Las Vegas, USA, Expanded Abstracts31, pp. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Willemsen, B. and Malcolm, A
    . [2015] Regularizing velocity differences in time-lapse FWI using gradient mismatch information. 85th Annual Meeting SEG, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts34, pp. 5384–5388.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Williamson, P.R., Cherrett, A.J., Sexton, P.A
    . [2007] A New Approach to Warping for Quantitative Time-Lapse Characterisation. 69th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, London, UK, 11–14 June, P064.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901583
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901583
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error