1887

Abstract

Summary

The last two decades are characterized by the emergence of both new approaches and ideas and the development of new devices and software for the collection, processing and presentation of spatial information in the Earth sciences. By applying laser scanning and photogrammetry, we have the ability to create digital models of natural objects, including digital models of outcrops. The process of creating digital models involves collecting field data, processing and presenting data. The results obtained are used for further processing with the use of specialized software. Laser scanning and photogrammetry have both advantages and disadvantages. The advantage of laser scanning is its high performance and independence from weather. But it is an expensive method of research. The photogrammetric approach is much cheaper, its significant disadvantage is dependence on weather conditions. The created digital models of geological objects for the west of Ukraine (9 objects) and 3 for Eastern Kazakhstan have demonstrated their possibility for further use in order to obtain geological and structural information. With these models, it is possible to get information from previously unavailable places. Also, information is more complete than traditional field research methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902078
2019-05-15
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hlotov, V., and Marusazh, H.
    [2013] Analysis of methods for creating frontal plans by laser terrestrial scanning and digital imaging. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography. 78,
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Novakova, L., and Pavlis, T. L.
    [2019] Modern Methods in Structural Geology of Twenty-first Century: Digital Mapping and Digital Devices for the Field Geology. In Teaching Methodologies in Structural Geology and Tectonics (43–54). Springer, Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Oszczypko, N., Uchman, A., and Bubniak, I.
    [2016] The Stebnyk Formation (Miocene) in the Boryslav-Pokuttya and Sambir nappes of the Ukrainian Carpathians: a record of environmental change in the Carpathian Foredeep. Geological Quarterly, 60(2), 473–492.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2014] The Dobrotiv Formation (Miocene) in the Boryslav-Pokuttya and Sambir nappes of the Ukrainian Carpathians: a record of sedimentary environmental change in the development of the Carpathian Foredeep Basin. Geological Quarterly, 58(3), 393–408.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [2012] Foreland provenance of thick conglomerates in the early stage of the Carpathian Foredeep development: the case of the Sloboda Conglomerate (Lower Miocene), western Ukraine. Geological Quarterly, 56(4), 789–802.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902078
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902078
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error