Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Stein Variational Gradient Descent with Applications to Data Assimilation

References

1. Chen, P., Wu, K., Chen, J., O'Leary-Roseberry, T. and Ghattas, O. [2019] Projected Stein Variational Newton: A Fast and Scalable Bayesiqan Inference Method in High Dimensions. arXiv:1901.08659.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D.S. [2013] Levenberg-Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification. Computational Geosciences, 1–15.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chwialkowski, K., Strathmann, H. and Gretton, A. [2016] A Kernel test of Goodness of Fit. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning. JMRL.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Emerick, A. and Reynolds, A. [2013] Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. Computers & Geosciences, 55, 3–15.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Evensen, G. and van Leeuwen, P.J. [2000] An Ensemble Kalman Smoother for Nonlinear Dynamics. Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1852–1867.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Feng, Y., Wang, D. and Liu, Q. [2017] Learning to draw Samples with Amortized Stein Variational Gradient Descent. arXiv:1707.06626v2.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Francois, D., Wertz, V. and Verleysen, M. [2005] About locality of kernels in high-dimensional spaces. In: International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis. AS-DMA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Han, J. and Liu, Q. [2018] Stein variational gradient descent without gradient. arXiv:1806.02775v1.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kitanidis, P.K. [1995] Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing. Water resources research, 31(10), 2411–2419.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Liu, Q., Lee, J.D. and Jordan, M. [2016] A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness of fit Tests. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning. JMRL.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Liu, Q. and Wang, D. [2016] Stein variational gradient descent: A general purpose bayesian inference algorithm. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2378–2386.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Minh, H.Q. [2010] Some Properties of Gaussian Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces and Their Implications for Function Approximation and Learning Theory. Constructive Approximation, 32(2), 307–338.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Oliver, D.S., He, N. and Reynolds, A.C. [1996] Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data. In: European Conference for the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, V. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Pulido, M. and van Leeuwen, P.J. [2018] Kernel Embedding of maps for Bayesian Inference: The variational mapping particle filter. arXiv:1805.11380.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Pulido, M., van Leeuwen, P.J. and Posselt, D.J. [2019] Kernel embedded nonlinear observational mappings in the variational mapping particle filter. arXiv:1901.10426.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Stordal, A. and Elsheikh, A. [2015] Iterative Ensemble Smoothers in the Annealed Importance Sampling Framework. Advances in Water Resources, 86, 231–239.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Zhou, D. [2008] Derivative reproducing properties for kernel methods in learning theory. Journal od computational and Applied Mathematics, 220, 456–463.
    [Google Scholar]