1887

Abstract

Summary

Clay smear is an important fault seal mechanism which controls fluid distribution in hydrocarbon fields. Although the idea is four decades old and extensive research and application in the subsurface has improved our understanding, predicting fault seal by clay smear remains a challenge. The complex architecture of fault zones and the difficulties of critically testing subsurface predictions calls for a challenge to the reliability of current methods. Empirical predictions rely on local calibration, but commonly actual findings are quite different from predictions. The objective of this paper is to share some pioneering sandbox experiments 25 done years ago to determine the structural processes and physical parameters that control clay smear formation. Two modes of clay smear formation have been modelled: injection and smear. The mode is determined by the contrast in strength between the clay and the surrounding rocks. If the strength contrast is low (relatively strong clay layer), no injection occurs, and the fault zone is a sheared equivalent of the faulted stratigraphy. If the strength contrast is high enough (soft clay), injection of clay into the fault zone is triggered. These experimental results led to the development of the squeezing block concept of clay injection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902308
2019-09-08
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Freeman, S.R., Harris, S. D. & Knipe, R. J.
    , 2010. Cross-fault sealing, baffling and fluid flow in 3D geological models: tools for analysis, visualization and interpretation. In Jolley, S. J., Fisher, Q. J., Ainsworth, R. B., Vrolijk, P. J. & Delisle, S. J. (eds) Reservoir Compartmentalization. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 347, 257–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kettermann, M., Thronberens, S. Juarez, O., Urai, J.L., Ziegler, M., Asmus, S. and Krüger, U.
    , 2016. Mechanisms of clay smear formation in unconsolidated sediments insights from 3-D observations of excavated normal faults. Solid Earth, 7, 789–815
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lehner, F.K., Pilaar, W.F.
    , 1997. The emplacement of clay smears in synsedimentary normal faults: inferences from field observations near Frechen, Germany. In: Møller-Pedersen, P., Koestler, A.G. (Eds.), Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications: Hydrocarbon Seals: Importance for Exploration and Production. Elsevier Science, pp. 39e50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Richard, P.D., Urai, J.L.
    , 2001. In: Nieuwland, D.A., Nijman, M. (Eds.), The Atlas of Structural Geometry: a Digital Collection of 25 Years of Analogue Modelling. Geol. Mijnb./Neth. J. Geosci. 80 (2), 59–60.
  5. Vrolijk, P., Urai, J.L., Kettermann, M.
    , 2016. Clay Smear: Review of Mechanisms and Applications. Journal of Structural Geology, 86, 95–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van der Zee, W., Urai, J. L., and Richard, P. D.
    2003. Lateral clay injection into normal faults, GeoArabia, 8, 501–522.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902308
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902308
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error