1887

Abstract

Summary

We examine compact air gun source concepts as a practical solution to mitigate the environmental impact of received sound levels during marine seismic surveys. The relative sound pressure level (SPL) and sound exposure level (SEL) are quantified for 1. Large arrays of air guns activated simultaneously with no significant recorded overlap in emitted acoustic pressure, 2. Small arrays of air guns activated simultaneously or in rapid succession, with recorded overlap in emitted acoustic pressure, 3. Individual air guns activated continuously with significant recorded overlap in emitted acoustic pressure—otherwise known as continuous wavefield acquisition, and 4. Marine vibrators that may sweep continuously and interfere with each other.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903339
2019-10-29
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Feltham, A., Girard, M., Jenkerson, M., Nechayuk, V., Griswold, S., Henderson, N. and Johnson, G.
    [2017] The Marine Vibrator Joint Industry Project: four years on.Exploration Geophysics, 49(5), 675–687.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hegna, H., Klüver, T. and Lima, J.
    [2018] Benefits of continuous source and receiver side wavefields.88th SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 41–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Wisløff, J.F.W., Bastard, M. and Asgedom, E.
    [2018] Environmental impact of a set of marine compressed air source configurations – a comparative study.80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, WS14.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903339
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903339
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error