1887

Abstract

Summary

Full waveform inversion (FWI) works by iteratively minimizing an objective function that measures the misfit between observed and predicted data in the least-squares sense. However, FWI suffers from significant problems. First, the inversion solved by gradient techniques may not lead to the globally optimal solution. Second, all wave propagation mechanisms are not adequately considered if one does not assume a stiffness tensor structure that truly represents the subsurface. Third, depending on the parameterization used for inversion, elastic properties may be coupled and updates of one parameter may impact others, an effect known as interparameter crosstalk. Additionally, some combinations of model parameters can be lithologically implausible, and not represent feasible lithological units. We derive anisotropic subsurface models using elastic FWI and explicitly impose petrophysical penalties to recover models consistent with the seismic data as well as with the petrophysical context in the area. This methodology reduces the potential negative impact of local minima, mitigates interparameter crosstalk artifacts, and avoids geologically implausible models. We define this penalty using probability density functions derived from petrophysical information. The proposed FWI objective function leads to robust anisotropic models that represent plausible lithologies, while at the same time leading to data predictions consistent with the observations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010191
2021-10-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aragao, O. and Sava, P.
    [2019a] Elastic full waveform inversion probabilistic petrophysical model constraints. SEG International Exposition and 89th Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1425–1429.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2019b] Elastic wavefield tomography using probabilistic petrophysical clustering. SEG International Exposition and 89th Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1420–1424.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fomel, S., Sava, P., Vlad, I., Liu, Y. and Bashkardin, V.
    [2013] Madagascar: open-source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments. Journal of Open Research Software, 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Operto, S., Gholami, Y., Prieux, V., Ribodetti, A., Brossier, R., Metivier, L. and Virieux, J.
    [2013] A guided tour of multiparameter full-waveform inversion with multicomponent data: from theory to practice. The Leading Edge, 32, 1040–1054.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Plessix, R.E. and Cao, Q.
    [2010] A parametrization study for surface seismic full waveform inversion in an acoustic vertical transversely isotropic medium. Geophysical Journal International, 185, 539–556.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pratt, R.G., Williamson, Z.M. and Warner, M.
    [1996] Two-dimensional velocity model from wide-angle seismic data by wavefield inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 124, 323–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [1988] Theoretical background for the inversion of seismic waveforms including elasticity and attenuation. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 128(1), 365–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tsvankin, I.
    [2012] Seismic Signatures and Analysis of Reflection Data in Anisotropic Media. Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010191
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010191
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error