1887

Abstract

Summary

Interpreting salt bodies in the subsurface is a challenging manual task that can take weeks to complete. Obtaining accurate picks of salt is very important, because errors in the placement of salt can result in severe degradation of the seismic image. To meet the challenges of speeding up imaging workflows and retaining accurate salt picks, we evaluate three deep learning approaches: a 2D window-based convolutional neural network, a 3D window-based convolutional neural network, and finally a 2D “U-Net” approach. A 3D seismic volume from the deep-water field Julia in the Gulf of Mexico was used to test these approaches. The Julia field has complex salt structures with overhangs and inclusions, and the thickness of salt can reach up to 5 km. The U-Net architecture proved to be the most accurate of the three methods tested, predicting the placement of salt at 98% accuracy, as compared to the human interpretation. Beyond accuracy, U-Net also proved to be the fastest, requiring only 3.5 hours to predict salt on the 3D seismic volume. The results presented here along with other recent studies of deep learning for salt interpretation represent a clear shift in the seismic interpretation workflow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010270
2021-10-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Duro, D. C., Franklin, S. E., and Dubé, M. G.
    [2012]. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery.Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.020
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Guillen, P., Larrazabal, G., González, G., Boumber, D., and Vilalta, R.
    [2015]. Supervised learning to detect salt body.81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1826–1829. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5931401.1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T.
    [2015]. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation.International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shafiq, M. A., Wang, Z., Alregib, G., Amin, A., and Deriche, M.
    [2017]. A texture-based interpretation workflow with application to delineating salt domes.Interpretation, 5(3), SJ1–SJ19. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2016-0043.1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shi, Y., Wu, X., and Fomel, S.
    [2018]. Automatic salt-body classification using a deep convolutional neural network.84th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1971–1975. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2997304.1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zabihi Naeini, E., and Di, H.
    [2018]. A comparative analysis of convolutional vs. deep neural networks.PETEX, Extended Abstract, 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zeng, Y., Jiang, K., and Chen, J.
    [2019]. Automatic Seismic Salt Interpretation with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325917.3325926
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010270
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010270
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error