1887

Abstract

Summary

When building the rock physics model for clayey sandstones, it is very important to know the contact type and content of cement clay in clayey sandstone for correctly understanding the influence of the cementation on acoustic velocity of clayey sandstone and how to reasonably establish rock physical model. At present, there is no laboratory method to directly quantitatively estimate the content of the cement clay, which leads to large errors in predicting acoustic velocities when using the cemented sands model for cemented sands formation because of the over-estimated of the cement clay. In this paper, a method for distinguishing cemented clay is proposed by observing the contact relationship and relative distribution between clay and particles in thin sections. The cement clay is used as the input parameter of the constant cement model. The comparison shows the velocities error predicted in our method is 20% lower than the original model, and the predicted results are significantly improved. The method proposed in this paper is a suitable rock physics model for weak cemented formation. It can predict acoustic velocity to identify favorable reservoirs and quantitatively evaluate reservoir parameters by combining seismic and logging data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010292
2021-10-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avesh, P., T.Mukerji, and G.Mavko
    , [2005], Quantitative seismic interpretation; Applying rock physis tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridege University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dvokin, J., A.Nur., and H.Yin
    , [1994] Effective properties of cemented granular materials. Mechanics of Material, 18, 351–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DvorkinJ.
    , [1996] Nur A. Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: Theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics„ 61(5):1363–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GuoJ and Han, X.
    [2016] Rock physics modelling of acoustic velocities for heavy oil sand. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 145, 436–443.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hashin, Z., and Shtrikman, S.
    [1963] A variational approach to the elastic behavior of multiphase materials. Mech Phys Solids, 11, 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MavkoG, MukerjiT, DvorkinJ.
    [2009] The rock physics handbook: Tools for seismic analysis of porous media. Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AvsethP, JohansenT A, BakhorjiA, et al.
    [2014]. Rock Physics Modeling Guided by Depositional and Burial History in Low to Intermediate Porosity Sandstones. Geophysics, 79(2):115–121
    [Google Scholar]
  8. R. J.Hill
    . [1963] Elastic Properties of Reinforced Solids: Some Theoretical Principles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11(5):357–372.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010292
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010292
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error