1887

Abstract

Summary

We investigate the physical mechanisms that produced felt seismicity during hydraulic stimulation of the Preston New Road PNR-1z well in Lancashire, England in October – December 2018. While pore pressure increases are typically assumed to be the principal cause of induced seismicity, other factors such as poroelastic stress transfer and aseismic slip have also been proposed as alternative mechanisms. At PNR-1z, a downhole microseismic monitoring array detected and located over 38,000 events during the stimulation, which revealed the interaction between the hydraulic fractures and a pre-existing fault. Here we probe this interaction in more detail, focussing on the role played by elastic stress transfer produced by the tensile opening of hydraulic fractures. We generate stochastic models to simulate the impact of tensile fracture opening on the surrounding stress field, and find that the observed microseismic event locations occur predominantly in regions where these effects moved the stress conditions towards the failure envelope. We therefore conclude that elastic stress transfer from tensile opening of hydraulic fractures played an important role in controlling fault reactivation at this site.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010305
2021-10-18
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BaoX. and D.W.Eaton
    [2016]. Fault activation by hydraulic fracturing in Western Canada. Science354, 1406–1409.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ClarkeH., J.P.Verdon, T.Kettlety, A.F.Baird, J-M.Kendall
    [2019]. Real time imaging, forecasting and management of human-induced seismicity at Preston New Road, Lancashire, England. Seismological Research Letters90, 1902–1915.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DengK, Y.Liu, R.M.Harrington
    [2016]. Poroelastic stress triggering of the December 2013 Crooked Lake, Alberta, induced seismicity sequence. Geophysical Research Letters43, 8482–8491.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GreenR.G., T.Greenfield, R.S.White
    [2015]. Triggered earthquakes suppressed by an evolving stress shadow from a propagating dyke. Nature Geoscience8, 629–632.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KettletyT., J.P.Verdon, M.J.Werner, J-M.Kendall
    [2020]. Stress transfer from opening hydraulic fractures controls the distribution of induced seismicity. Journal of Geophysical Research, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PerkinsT.K. and L.R.Kern
    [1961]. Widths of hydraulic fractures. Journal of Petroleum Technology13, 937–949.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. VerdonJ.P., N.Igonin, M.Kendall, D.Eaton
    [2019]. Fault reactivation via pre-existing fracture networks during hydraulic fracturing. SECED Conference, London, Abstract 7.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WangR., F.Lorenzo-Martin, F.Roth
    [2006]. PSGRN/PSCMP — a new code for calculating co- and post-seismic deformation, geoid and gravity changes based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory. Computers and Geosciences32, 527–541.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010305
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010305
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error