1887

Abstract

Summary

In case of a broken hologram, an image of the complete object can still be obtained from one of the fragments. The reason is that each diffraction point of the object sends out waves that reach every point on the hologram. As an analogy, we propose to separate diffractions from standard seismic reflection data. The use of a decimated version of such data (violating the Nyquist sample condition) should still contain all necessary information to obtain an image of the finer details of the subsurface employing the concept of holographic migration. The feasibility of the proposed approach is supported by a field data example from the Barents Sea.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010488
2021-10-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bondani, M. and Favele, F.
    [2013] Following the path of light: Recovering and manipulating the information about an object.Proceeding of SPIE — The International Society for Optical Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Faccipieri, J., Coimbra, T.A., Gelius, L.-J. and Tygel, M.
    [2016] Stacking apertures and estimation strategies for reflection and diffraction enhancement.Geophysics, 81, V271–V282.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gabor, D.
    [1948] A new microscopic principle.Nature, 161, 777–778.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Neidell, N.S.
    [1997] Perceptions in seismic imaging Part 2: Reflective and diffractive contributions to seismic imaging.The Leading Edge, August Issue, 1121–1123.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Neidell, N.S. and Charuk, J.
    [2018] Seismic image undersampling — Resolution, visibility, and display.The Leading Edge, January Issue, 37–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Robinson, E.A.
    [1998] Holistic migration.The Leading Edge, March Issue, 313–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [2018] Extended resolution: Neidell is right.The Leading Edge, January Issue, 33–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stark, T.
    [2013] Signal recovery beyond conventional Nyquist: The sample rates used for seismic acquisition do not need to limit the maximum recoverable frequencies.The Leading Edge32, 1334–1339.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tabti, T., Gelius, L.-J. and Hellmann, T.
    [2004] Fresnel aperture prestack depth migration.First Break22, 39–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vinje, V., Lie, J.E., Danielsen, V., Dhelie, P.E., Silliqi, R., Nilsen, C.-I., Hicks, E. and Camerer, A.
    [2017] Shooting over the seismic spread.First Break, 35, 97–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wisecup, R.D.
    [1998] Unambiguous signal recovery above the Nyquist using random-sample-interval imaging.Geophysics, 63, 763–771.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010488
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010488
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error