1887

Abstract

Summary

Currently, missing seismic data because of too sparse sampling or irregularities in acquisition greatly hinders accurate seismic processing and interpretation. Reconstruction of highly sparse, irregular data to dense data can therefore aid in processing and interpretation of far sparser, more efficient seismic surveys. Here, two methods to solve the reconstruction problem, that requires an inverse operator mapping sparse to dense data, are compared in both space-time and wavenumber-frequency domain. The deterministic inversion is efficiently solved by least squares optimisation using an numerically-efficient Python-based linear operator representation. An alternative method is the probabilistic approach that uses deep learning. Here, the specific deep learning architecture is a Recurrent Inference Machine (RIM), which is designed specifically to solve inverse problems given known forward operators. Our trained RIM proved to be able to map sparse to dense seismic data by reducing spatial aliasing in the wavenumber-frequency domain caused by sub-Nyquist spatial sampling in space-time domain. The RIM is therefore an improvement over deterministic inversion that could not undo spatial aliasing, leaving the benchmarking of RIMs to other deep learning architectures as a subject of ongoing study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202011046
2020-12-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hennenfent, G. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2008] Simply denoise: Wavefield reconstruction via jittered under-sampling.Geophysics, 73(3), V19–V28.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kingma, D.P. and Ba, J.
    [2014] Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ndajah, P., Kikuchi, H., Yukawa, M., Watanabe, H. and Muramatsu, S.
    [2010] SSIM image quality metric for denoised images. In: Proc. 3rd WSEAS Int. Conf. on Visualization, Imaging and Simulation. 53–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Peng, H. and Vasconcelos, I.
    [2019] A study of acquisition-related sub-sampling and aperture effects on Marchenko focusing and redatuming. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 248–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Putzky, P. and Welling, M.
    [2017] Recurrent inference machines for solving inverse problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04008.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ravasi, M. and Vasconcelos, I.
    [2020] PyLops—A linear-operator Python library for scalable algebra and optimization.SoftwareX, 11, 100361.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ruan, J. and Vasconcelos, I.
    [2019] Data-and prior-driven sampling and wavefield reconstruction for sparse, irregularly-sampled, higher-order gradient data. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 4515–4519.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Siahkoohi, A., Kumar, R. and Herrmann, F.
    [2018] Seismic data reconstruction with generative adversarial networks. In: 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202011046
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202011046
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error