1887

Abstract

Summary

The efficient development of a geothermal field can be largely affected by the inherent geological and physical uncertainties. Besides, the uncertain operational and economic parameters can also impact the profit of a project. Systematic uncertainty quantification involving these parameters helps to determine the probability of concerning outputs. In this study, a low-enthalpy geothermal reservoir with strong heterogeneity, located in the West Netherlands Basin, is selected as the research area.

Detailed geological model is constructed based on various static data including seismic and log interpretation. However, significant uncertainties still exist in definition of the model parameters, mainly reservoir permeability and porosity. Besides, the fluid properties have not been sampled in this field and can vary in the range between brackish to highly saline water. Also, the heat price and operational investment fluctuate with time and add up to uncertainty. Taking all interested parameters into consideration, the Monte Carlo method is utilized to select specific input data set. The forward simulations are powered by the GPU version of Delft Advance Research Terra Simulator (DARTS), which provides efficient simulation capabilities for geothermal applications. Through this investigation, a wide range of production temperature has been observed due to the uncertainty of the input parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202021080
2020-11-16
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. [1]Daniilidis, A., Alpsoy, B., Herber, R., 2017. Impact of technical and economic uncertainties on the economic performance of a deep geothermal heat system.Renewable Energy114, 805–816. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.090.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.090 [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]DARTS, 2020. Delft Advanced Research Terra Simulator.https://darts.citg.tudelft.nl.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Khait, M., Voskov, D., 2018b. Operator-based linearization for efficient modeling of geothermal processes.Geothermics74, 7–18. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.01.012.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.01.012 [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Saeid, S., Wang, Y., Daniilidis, A., Khait, M., Voskov, D., Bruhn, D., 2020. Lifetime and energy prediction of geothermal systems: Uncertainty analysis in highly heterogeneous geothermal reservoirs (Netherlands).World Geothermal Congress.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Voskov, D., 2017. Operator-based linearization approach for modeling of multiphase multi-component flow in porous media.Journal of Computational Physics337, 275–288. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.041.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.041 [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Wang, Y., Voskov, D., Khait, M., Bruhn, D., 2020. An efficient numerical simulator for geothermal simulation: A benchmark study.Applied Energy264. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114693.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114693 [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Wiggers, C., 2019. The Delft Sandstone in the West Netherlands Basin.Master’s thesis.https://repository.tudelft.nl.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202021080
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202021080
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error