1887

Abstract

Summary

Automated facies identification workflows which use Machine Learning (ML) are publicly available but perform sub-optimally (accuracy in the order of 60%) due to a lack of integration with geological domain knowledge. Existing tools consider well log values mostly on a depth-by-depth basis, using only very basic feature engineering. Our solution aims to integrate ML with well-established geoscience principles (also referred to as geo-rules) such as sequence stratigraphy, proximal-distal trends, and log-trend patterns. Geological knowledge is incorporated into ML to improve the quality and robustness of facies prediction and is captured as additional geologically-inspired features added to the dataset. These features include the mean value and other derived properties of intervals, density-neutron separation, segmentation and wavelet transform. All ML algorithms tested with this augmented set of features show significant improvement in performance metrics as compared to solutions with basic logs only.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032046
2020-11-30
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hall, B.
    [2016] Facies classification using machine learning. The Leading Edge, 35, 906–909.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hall, M., and Hall, B.
    [2017] Distributed collaborative prediction: Results of the machine learning contest. The Leading Edge, 36, 267–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Liping, Z., Hongqi, L., and Zhongguo, Y.
    [2018] Intelligent Logging Lithological Interpretation With Convolution Neural Network. Petrophysics, 59, No. 6, 799–810.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., and Michel, V.
    [2011] Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. Retrieved from scikit-learn.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tharwat, A.
    [2018] Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Truong, Ch., Oudre, L., and Vayatis, N.
    [2019] Selective review of offline change point detection methods [arXiv:1801.00718 [cs.CE]]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032046
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032046
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error