1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper presents a novel approach of productivity prediction in Montney shale formation by integrating data-driven method, exploratory data analysis (EDA) and deep neural network (DNN). In this study, a total of approximately 1500 wells. First, the EDA discovered a distribution of un-refined data and null data. In the above analysis, in order to avoid overfitting the proposed DNN model, an outlier analysis of the dataset was performed and an 1143 well was selected as a training data set. Second, in the DNN model, the applicability of categorical variables through one-hot encoding was verified. Hyperparameters optimization of the DNN model also resulted in dropout layer application (without), number of hidden layers (3), number of neurons (200), activation function (ReLU), and learning rate (0.002). Comparisons with optimized DNN model and other supervised learning models, random forest and support vector machine, showed that the DNN model had a minimum of 3.2% lower the mean absolute percentage error values and a minimum of 0.025 lower the root mean squared error values. The proposed DNN model was found to have superior predictive performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032077
2020-11-30
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aguilera, R.
    [2014] Flow units: from conventional to tight-gas to shale-gas to tight-oil to shale-oil reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 17, 190–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Awoleke, O.O., Lane, R.H.
    [2011] Analysis of data from the Barnett shale using conventional statistical and virtual intelligence techniques. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 14 (5), 544–556.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Breiman, L.
    [2001] Random forests. Machine. Learning. 45 (1), 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarkson, C.R., Jensen, J.L., Pedersen, P.K., Freeman, M.
    [2012] Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir. AAPG (Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.) Bull. 96, 355–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.
    , 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine. Learning. 20, 273–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghanizadeh, A., Clarkson, C.R., Aquino, S., Ardakani, O.H., Sanei, H.
    [2015] Petrophysical and geomechanical characteristics of Canadian tight oil and liquid-rich gas reservoir: I. pore network and permeability characterization. Fuel,153, 664–681.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Han, D., Kwon, S.
    [2018] Selection of decline curve analysis method using the cumulative production in cline rate for transient production data obtained from a multi-stage hydraulic fractured horizontal well in unconventional gas fields. Int. J. Oil, Gas and Coal Technology,18(Nos. 3/4), 384–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.
    [2015] Deep Learning. Nature, 521, 436–444
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohaghegh, S., Abdull, F.
    , [2014] Production Management Decision Analysis Using AI-Based Proxy Modeling of Reservoir Simulations – A Look-Back Case Study SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 27–29 October, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Scornet, E., Biau, G., Vert, J.
    [2015] Consistency of random forests. Annals of Statistics. 43 (4), 1716–1741.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhou, Q., Dilmore, R., Kleit, A., Wang, J.Y.
    [2014] Evaluating gas production performances in marcellus using data mining technologies. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 20, 109–120
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032077
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032077
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error