1887

Abstract

Summary

These days machine learning models are used on a regular basis for various complex oil and gas tasks. One of the most popular business problems is well log data autointerpretation. However, these models, in most cases, require large amount of data which can be obtained only from mature oil fields. It assumes high variability in data due to different tools, well and measurements record conditions. It leads to noisy datasets with number inconsistencies affecting accuracy of model prediction and resulting in many misclassifications and outliers. Application of spatial geological information from other wells can increase prediction robustness.

The main aim of presented research is to develop a method of spatial geological data incorporation into conventional machine learning net pay intervals autointerpretation in pipeline in order to improve quality of model prediction. Approach for a spatial geological features aggregation was proposed. They were used for developing a spatial ranking model allowing estimation of geological consistency for each predicted net pay interval. Capability of the proposed methodology was proven by mathematical metrics and expert blind test. It was clearly shown that incorporation of spatial data dramatically increases machine learning models prediction quality and eliminate inconsistent intervals produced by noisy data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032088
2020-11-30
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.Hall, B., [2016] Facies classification using machine learning, The Leading Edge Volume 35
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.M.Dubois, G.Bohling, S.Chakrabarti [2007] ‘Comparison of four approaches to a rock facies classification problem’, Computers and Geosciences, 33(5), pp. 599–617
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.D.Egorov, N.Bukhanov, B.Belozerov, V.Rukavishnikov [2018] Automatic Interpretation of Facies from Wireline Logs by Using Hierarchical Machine Learning Approach. EAGE Saint-Petersburg 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.D.Egorov, A.Sabirov, O.Osmonalieva, B.Belozerov, A.Reshytko, A.Klenitskiy, A.Shchepetnov, A.Semenikhin [2019] Applying Machine Learning Methods to Search for Missing Net Pay Zones in Mature Oilfields Wells, SPE RPTC 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.K.Struminskiy, A.Klenitskiy, A.Reshytko, D.Egorov, A.Shchepetnov, A.Sabirov, D.Vetrov, A.Semenikhin, O.Osmonalieva, B.Belozerov [2019] Well Log Data Standardization, Imputation and Anomaly Detection Using Hidden Markov Models, EAGE Petroleum Geostatistics 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.M.Korjani, A.Popa, E.Grijalva, S.Cassidy, I.Ershaghi [2016] A New Approach to Reservoir Characterization Using Deep Learning Neural Networks, SPE Western Regional Meeting
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.J.Freedman [2002] Stochastic Gradient Boosting, SPE Western Regional Meeting, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis38(4):367–378
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 7.J.Freedman [2002] Stochastic Gradient Boosting, SPE Western Regional Meeting, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis38(4):367–378
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 8.T.Chen, C.Guestring [2016] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, KDD '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032088
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202032088
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error