1887

Abstract

Summary

We investigate the numerical simulation of polymer flooding model without IPV law [1] and with the IPV percolation law [2]. The two mathematical models (with and without the percolation law) are weakly hyperbolic. They include a resonance region where strict hyperbolicity is lost.

Providing exact solution to Riemann problems and devising accurate numerical schemes is a challenging task.

Without IPV law, the mathematical model coincides with the Keyfitz-Kranzer model [3]. For all initial data, a unique solution to the Riemann problem can be defined thanks to Isaacson and Temple’s entropy condition [1], which is to be imposed in addition to Lax’s one. Our theoretical contribution is to prove that the two models (with and without the IPV percolation law) are equivalent for both smooth and discontinuous solutions, up to a change of variables. Finally, we are able to provide a unique solution of the Riemann problems for both models.

Regarding our numerical simulation contributions, we propose second order finite volume schemes based on the Godunov scheme and a new Suliciu-type [4] relaxation scheme which can be applied to any IPV law. For the two mathematical models, we perform a mesh convergence and compute the errors of approximate solutions relatively to exact solutions and then determine the effective order of those schemes. Because of the system resonance and non-linearity, the so-called first and second order schemes have respectively an effective order of about 0.24 and 0.33 in contact discontinuities, both 0.5 in shocks and, 0.66 and 0.86 in rarefaction waves.

Because of this lack of accuracy, we implement the Glimm scheme for the two mathematical models. The obtained results are in good agreement with the exact solutions. Shocks and contact discontinuities are resolved with three points at most.

[1] E. L. Isaacson, J. B. Temple (1986), “Analysis of a singular hyperbolic system of conservation laws,” J. Diff. Eqs., vol 2, no. 65, pp 250–268.

[2] G. A. Bartelds, J. Bruining, J. Molenaar (1997), “The modeling of velocity enhancement in polymer flooding,” Transp. Porous Media, vol 1, no 26, pp 75–88.

[3] B. L. Keyfitz and H. C. Kranzer (1980), “A system of non-strictly hyperbolic conservation laws arising in elasticity theory,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol 72, no 3, pp 219–241.

[4] I. Suliciu (1988), “On the thermodynamics of fluids with relaxation and phase transitions fluids with relaxation,” Int. J. Engin. Sci., vol 36, pp 921–947.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035090
2020-09-14
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bartelds, G.A., Bruining, J. and Molenaar, J.
    [1997] The Modeling of Velocity Enhancement in Polymer Flooding. Transp. Porous Media, 26(1), 75–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouchut, F.
    [2003] Entropy satisfying flux vector splittings and kinetic BGK models. Numer. Math., 94(4), 623–672.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2004] Nonlinear stability of finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws and well-balanced schemes for sources. Frontiers in Mathematics. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Braconnier, B., Preux, C., Flauraud, E., Tran, Q.H. and Berthon, C.
    [2017] An analysis of physical models and numerical schemes for polymer flooding simulations. Comput. Geosci., 21(5), 1267–1279.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T.
    [1964] Hydraulic properties of porous media and their relation to drainage design. Trans. ASAE, 7(1), 26–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Butcher, J.C.
    [2003] Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Colella, P.
    [1982] Glimm’s method for gas dynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 3(1), 76–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Corey, A.T.
    [1977] Mechanics of heterogenous fluids in porous media. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. van der Corput, J.
    [1935] Verteilungsfunktionen I–II. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc, 38, 1058–1066.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Datta-Gupta, A., Pope, G.A., Seperhrnoori, K. and Thrasher, R.L.
    [1986] A Symmetric, Positive Definite Formulation of a Three-Dimensional Micellar/Polymer Simulator. SPE Reserv. Eng., 1(6), 622–632. SPE-13504-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Delshad, M., Pope, G.A. and Sepehrnoori, K.
    [1996] A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation: 1. Formulation. J. Contam. Hydrol, 23(4), 303–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Desveaux, V. and Berthon, C.
    [2014] An entropy preserving MOOD scheme for the Euler equations. International Journal On Finite Volumes, 11, 1–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dongmo Nguepi, G.L., Braconnier, B., Preux, C., Tran, Q.H. and Berthon, C.
    [2020] A relaxation method for the simulation of possibly non-hyperbolic polymer flooding models with inaccessible pore volume effect. FVCA-IX.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gallouet, T., Herard, J.M. and Seguin, N.
    [2002] Some recent finite volume schemes to compute Euler equations using real gas EOS. International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 39(12), 1073–1138.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. de Gennes, P.G.
    [1979] Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Glimm, J.
    [1965] Solutions in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 18(4), 697–715.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Green, D.W. and Willhite, G.P.
    [1998] Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE textbook series, 6. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hilden, S., Nilsen, H. and Raynaud, X.
    [2016] Study of the Well-Posedness of Models for the Inaccessible Pore Volume in Polymer Flooding. Transp. Porous Media, 114(1), 65–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Isaacson, E.L. and Temple, J.B.
    [1986] Analysis of a Singular Hyperbolic System of Conservation Laws. J. Diff. Eqs., 65(2), 250–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Keyfitz, B.L. and Kranzer, H.C.
    [1980] A system of non-strictly hyperbolic conservation laws arising in elasticity theory. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 72(3), 219–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lake, L.W.
    [1989] Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. van Leer, B.
    [1979] Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32(1), 101–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, T.P.
    [1977] The deterministic version of the Glimm scheme. Comm. Math. Phys., 57(2), 135–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pope, G.A.
    [1980] The Application of Fractional Flow Theory to Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Journal, 20(3), 191–205. SPE-7660-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pope, G.A. and Nelson, R.C.
    [1978] A Chemical Flooding Compositional Simulator. SPE Journal, 18(5), 339–354. SPE-6725-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P.
    [2007] Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Preux, C. and Malinouskaya, I.
    [2019] Reservoir simulation model calibration methodology with polymer flooding based on laboratory experiments. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 181, 106176.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sorbie, K.S.
    [1991] Polymer-Improved Oil Recovery. Springer Science, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Suliciu, I.
    [1988] On the thermodynamics of fluids with relaxation and phase transitions. Fluids with relaxation. Int. J. Engin. Sci., 36, 921–947.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035090
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035090
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error