1887

Abstract

Summary

The permeability field in a reservoir simulation greatly influences the resulting flow field and therefore a thorough knowledge of it is crucial. However, the permeability field is usually associated with a high degree of uncertainty since only few measurements of reservoir properties are available. Fractures can form highly conductive shortcuts through the matrix domain. Therefore, it is important to estimate fracture parameters such as location, orientation and size as precisely as possible. Ensemble Kalman filters (EnKF) are widely used for history matching (or data assimilation) in the context of sub-surface flows in order to estimate parameters, reduce uncertainty and improve simulation results.

This work studies the evolution of a reservoir as it might occur e.g. during reservoir stimulation of a geothermal system. During the first stage, large isolated fractures with a preferred orientation arise one after the other. During the second stage, these fractures get connected by others, which have a different preferred orientation. We assume that location, orientation and length of all fractures are known a priori. The only uncertainty therefore lies in the hydraulic aperture of each fracture segment. Further we assume that prior probabilistic knowledge of the hydraulic aperture is available, e.g. from seismic measurements. We upscale the fractures and simulate the flow in the reservoir with a single-continuum model.

We reduce the uncertainty of the hydraulic apertures with an iterative EnKF using empirical measurement data; here from a reference simulation. During the formation of the fractures, we use pressure and flow at in- and outlet boundaries as measurements. Once the whole reservoir is developed, a tracer is injected at the inlet and its concentration at the outlet boundary is used as measurement. In this context also the effect of different fracture-matrix permeability ratios is studied.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035126
2020-09-14
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asch, M., Bocquet, M. and Nodet, M.
    [2016] Chapter 6: The ensemble Kalman filter. Fundamentals of Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 153–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berre, I., Doster, F. and Keilegavlen, E.
    [2018] Flow in Fractured Porous Media: A Review of Conceptual Models and Discretization Approaches.Transport in Porous Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chai, Z., Tang, H., He, Y., Killough, J. and Wang, Y.
    [2018] Uncertainty Quantification of the Fracture Network with a Novel Fractured Reservoir Forward Model. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, H. and Zhang, D.
    [2018] History Matching of Stimulated Reservoir Volume of Shale-Gas Reservoirs Using an Iterative Ensemble Smoother.SPE Journal,23(02), 346–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D.S.
    [2012] Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood Method as an Iterative Ensemble Smoother.Mathematical Geosciences,44(1), 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2013] Levenberg-Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification.Computational Geosciences,17(4), 689–703.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Elahi, S.H. and Jafarpour, B.
    [2015] Characterization of Fracture Length and Conductivity From Tracer Test and Production Data With Ensemble Kalman Filter. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. URTeC.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [2018] Dynamic Fracture Characterization From Tracer-Test and Flow-Rate Data With Ensemble Kalman Filter.SPE Journal,23(02), 449–466.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Emerick, A.A. and Reynolds, A.C.
    [2013] Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation.Computers & Geosciences,55, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Evensen, G.
    [1994] Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans,99(C5), 10143–10162.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghods, P. and Zhang, D.
    [2010] Ensemble Based Characterization and History Matching of Naturally Fractured Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs. In: SPE Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kasap, E. and Lake, L.W.
    [1990] Calculating the Effective Permeability Tensor of a Gridblock.SPE Formation Evaluation,5(02), 192–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kwok, F. and Tchelepi, H.
    [2007] Potential-based reduced Newton algorithm for nonlinear multiphase flow in porous media.Journal of Computational Physics,227(1), 706–727.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. van Leeuwen, P.J. and Evensen, G.
    [1996] Data Assimilation and Inverse Methods in Terms of a Probabilistic Formulation.Monthly Weather Review,124(12), 2898–2913.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, X., Dai, C, Xue, L. and Ji, B.
    [2018] Estimation of fracture distribution in a CO2-EOR system through Ensemble Kalman filter.Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology,8(2), 257–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu, L. and Zhang, D.
    [2015] Assisted History Matching for Fractured Reservoirs by Use of Hough-Transform-Based Parameterization.SPE Journal,20(05), 942–961.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Matthai, S.K. and Belayneh, M.
    [2004] Fluid flow partitioning between fractures and a permeable rock matrix.Geophysical Research Letters,31(7).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Moreno, J., Tarrahi, M., Gildin, E. and Gonzales, S.
    [2014] Real-Time Estimation of Hydraulic Fracture Characteristics From Production Data. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. URTeC.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nejadi, S., Leung, J.Y.W, Trivedi, J.J. and Virues, C.J.J.
    [2014] Integrated Characterization of Hydraulically Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs Production History Matching. In: SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference - Canada. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Phillips, O.M.
    [1991] Flow and reactions in permeable rocks.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [etc.].
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ping, J., Al-Hinai, O. and Wheeler, M.F
    [2017] Data assimilation method for fractured reservoirs using mimetic finite differences and ensemble Kalman filter.Computational Geosciences,21(4), 781–794.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ping, J. and Zhang, D.
    [2013] History matching of fracture distributions by ensemble Kalman filter combined with vector based level set parameterization.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,108, 288–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Skjervheim, J.a. and Evensen, G.
    [2011] An Ensemble Smoother for Assisted History Matching. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tanaka, M., Tanaka, S., Arihara, N. and Okabe, H.
    [2010] Estimation of Fracture Effective Permeability by Upscaling Using Ensemble Kalman Filter. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yao, M., Chang, H, Li, X. and Zhang, D.
    [2018] Tuning Fractures With Dynamic Data.Water Resources Research,54(2), 680–707.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Yao, M., Chang, H., Li, X. and Zhang, D.
    [2019] An Integrated Approach for History Matching of Multiscale-Fractured Reservoirs.SPE Journal,24(04), 1508–1525.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhe, L., Younis, R. and Jiang, J.
    [2016] A Diagnostic Framework for “Bashed” Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs: A Numerical Simulation and Model Selection Theory Approach. In: SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. URTeC.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035126
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202035126
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error