1887

Abstract

Summary

In our study, we investigate the correlation between seismic attenuation and fracture connectivity in fractured porous fluid-saturated media. In particular, wave-induced fluid flow attenuation mechanism manifests itself between fracture-filling material and background as well as within intersecting fractures. To estimate seismic wave attenuation concerning fracture connectivity, we first statistically generate fracture networks with different percolation length through whole fracture system. Then we perform numerical modeling of plane wave propagation within generated models. Using resulting wavefields, we numerically estimate frequency-dependent attenuation. Both cases of high-permeable and almost non-permeable background are considered. Results show that the dominant parameter affecting attenuation is fracture connectivity. However, attenuation increase with connectivity increase is caused by intensifying fracture-to-background WIFF, while fracture-to-fracture WIFF remains local and depends mostly on local fracture connectivity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202053108
2020-11-16
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biot, M. A.
    , 1956, Theory of propagation of elastic waves in fluid-saturated porous solid. I. low-frequency range: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 168–178, https://doi.org/10.1121/L1908239
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1121/L1908239 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lebedev, M. et al.
    , 2017, Carbon geosequestration in limestone: Pore-scale dissolution and geomechanical weakening: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 66, 106–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.09.016
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  3. Masson, Y. J. et al.
    , 2006, Finite difference modeling of Biot's poroelastic equations at seismic frequencies: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B10305), https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004366
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004366 [Google Scholar]
  4. Novikov, M. et al.
    , 2017, Numerical study of fracture connectivity response in seismic wavefields: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, edited, 3786–3790, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017‑17659066.1
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17659066.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Rubino, J. G. et al.
    , 2014, Seismoacoustic signatures of fracture connectivity: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(3), 2252–2271, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010567
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010567 [Google Scholar]
  6. Rytov, S. M. et al.
    , 1988, Principles of Statistical Radiophysics 2. Correlation Theory of Random Processes, Springer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg, 234 p.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202053108
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202053108
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error