1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

This work proposes an experimental methodology for the characterization of the susceptibility to landslides in the Reggio Calabria area through the combination of remote sensing, GIS systems and soft computing. In particular, we created, a map of the susceptibility to landslides in GIS environment using a neural network and a fuzzy methodology to produce an infrastructure attention level divided into five categories (levels) of risk. Subsequently, starting from this map, we identified the areas of the road’s network most exposed to landslide risk also using remote sensing techniques (classification and segmentation techniques) overlapped on the open street map. This system provides us the level of attention that affects the transport infrastructure investigated (a higher level of attention corresponds to a higher level of landslide risk).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205712
2020-12-07
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2020/geoterrace-2020/GeoTerrace-2020-012-Bernardo.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205712&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barrile, V., Meduri, G.M., and Bilotta, G.
    (2014). Experimentations and integrated applications laser scanner/GPS for automated surveys.WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, 10(1), 471–480.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrile, V., and Bilotta, G.
    (2014) Self-localization by laser scanner and GPS in automated surveys.Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 307, 293–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrile, V., Bilotta, G., D’Amore, E., Meduri, G.M., and Trovato, S.
    (2016) Structural Modeling of a Historic Castle using Close Range Photogrammetry.International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 10, 370–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrile, V., Bilotta, G., and Fotia, A.
    (2018). Analysis of hydraulic risk territories: Comparison between LIDAR and other different techniques for 3D modeling.WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 14, 45–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrile, V., Fotia, A., and Bernardo, E.
    (2019a). The submerged Heritage: a virtual journey in our Seabed.ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42(2/W10), 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrile, V., Candela, G., Fotia, A., and Bernardo, E.
    (2019b) UAV Survey of Bridges and Viaduct: Workflow and Application.Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11622, 269–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Postorino, N.M., Barrile, V., and Cotroneo, F.
    (2006) Surface movement ground control by means of a GPS-GIS system.Journal of Air Transport Management, 12(6), 375–381.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zadeh, L.A.
    (1965) Fuzzy Sets.Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernardo, E., and Bilotta, G.
    (2021) Monumental arc 3d model reconstruction through BIM technology.Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178, 1581–1589.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernardo, E., Musolino, M., and Maesano, M.
    (2021) San Pietro di Deca: From Knowledge to Restoration. Studies and Geomatics Investigations for Conservation, Redevelopment and Promotion.Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Barrile, V., Fotia, A.
    (2019) Seismic risk: GPS/GIS monitoring and neural network application to control active fault in Castrovillari area (South Italy).ArcHistoR, 6.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205712
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205712
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error