1887
PDF

Abstract

SUMMARY

The prospects for finding new oil and gas deposits in the Carpathian region largely depend on the possibility of clarifying and detailing the fronts of tectonic zones and deep faults, as well as thrusts and linear complications of the sedimentary cover, the position of which depends on the depth of the slice. These extended linear structures in gravity and magnetic fields are displayed by substantially elongated anomalies, chains of small local anomalies, contours of a sharp change in morphology of field or gradient bands. Isolation and tracking of anomalies that are hidden in a complex regional background or obscured by other factors are carry out with transformations. The probable geological content and estimated depth of the sources of localized groups of anomalies are determined by the frequency and relative depth characteristics of the transformations. The paper proposes variants of combined isotropic and anisotropic transformations of averaging, which, according to their characteristics, are intended to detect local and substantially elongated anomalies of a certain direction, as well as the approximate depth of their sources, in gravity and magnetic fields. Examples of experimental application of these combined transformations are also given.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo032
2020-05-11
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2020/geoinf2020/GEOINF_2020_18145.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo032&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. AndreevB. A., KlushinI. G. [1962]. Geological interpretation of gravitational anomalies.Leningrad: Gostoptekhizdat, 1–495.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AnikeyevS.G., RozlovskaS.E., HablovskyiB.B., ShtogrynM.V., KarpenkoM.O. [2019]. Experiments with averaging transformation of gravity field (on the example of the southeast Ukrainian Carpathians)// XIIІ International Scientific Conference “Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment”, (12–15 November 2019, Kyiv, Ukraine). DOI: 10.3997/2214‑4609.201903204.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201903204 [Google Scholar]
  3. AnikeyevS. G. [2009]. About the method of detecting gravity anomalies of deep structures (on the example of the Ukrainian Carpathians).Geoinformatics, 1, 47–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BilichenkoV. Ja. [1999]. Structural-tectonic features of the para-autochthon of the Ukrainian Carpathians and adjacent territories by the materials of detailed gravimetry.Geology and geochemistry of combustible minerals,3 (108), 131–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KuznetsovaV.H., MaksymchukV.Yu. [2011]. The anomalous magnetic field and its relationship with the deep structure and the tectonics of the Ukrainian Carpathians.Geodynamics, no. 1(10), 127–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MatusevychA.V. [2013]. Gravity prospecting of the Caspian basin.Livny: Mukhametov G.V., 176.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MonchakL. S., AnikeyevS. G. [2017]. Display of the tectonic structure of the western region of Ukraine in the gravimagnetic fields.Geodynamics,2 (23), 104 – 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. StrakhovV. N. [1995]. The main directions of development of the theory and methodology of interpretation of geophysical data at the turn of the XXI century.Geophysics,3, 9–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TyapkinK., TyapkinO., YakimchukM. [2000]. Fundation of Geophysics.Kyiv: Carbon Ltd,1–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SaxovS., NygaardK. [1953]. Residual anomalies and depth estimation.Geophysics, 18, 4, 913.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo032
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo032
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error