Implicit 3D Subsurface Structural Modeling by Finite Elements

References

1. Caumon, G., Gray, G., Antoine, C. and Titeux, M.O.
   [2013] Three-dimensional implicit stratigraphic model building from remote sensing data on tetrahedral meshes: theory and application to regional model of La Popa Basin, NE Mexico. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(3).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chauvin, B., Lovely, P., Stockmeyer, J., Plesch, A., Caumon, G. and Shaw, J.
   [2018] Validating novel boundary conditions for three-dimensional mechanics-based restoration: An extensional sandbox model example. AAPG Bulletin, 102, 245–266.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Colletta, B., Letouzey, J., Pinedo, R., Ballard, J.F. and Balé, P.
   [1991] Computerized X-ray tomography analysis of sandbox models: Examples of thin-skinned thrust systems. Geology, 19, 1063–1067.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Crouzeix, M. and Raviart, P.A.
   [1973] Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations I. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis -ModélisationMathématiqueetAnalyseNumérique, 7(R3), 33–75.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Frank, T.
   [2007] 3D reconstruction of complex geological interfaces from irregularly distributed and noisy point data. Computers and Geosciences, 33, 932–943.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gonçalves, I.G., Guadagnin, F., Kumaira, S. and Da Silva, S.L.
   [2021] A machine learning model for structural trend fields. Computers and Geosciences, 149.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hughes, T.
   [2000] The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Dover Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Irakarama, M., Laurent, G., Renaudeau, J. and Caumon, G.
   [2018] Finite Difference Implicit Modeling of Geological Structures. In: 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Copenhagen, Denmark.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Irakarama, M., Laurent, G., Renaudeau, J. and Caumon, G.
   [2020] Finite Difference Implicit Structural Modeling of Geological Structures. Mathematical Geosciences.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lajaunie, C., Courrioux, G. and Manuel, L.
    [1997] Foliation fields and 3D cartography in geology: Principles of a method based on potential interpolation. Mathematical Geology, 29(4).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Laurent, G., Ailleres, L., Grose, L., Caumon, G., Jessell, M. and Armit, R.
    [2016] Implicit Modeling of Folds and Overprinting Deformation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 456, 26–38.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mallet, J.L.
    [1992] Discrete smooth interpolation in geometric modeling. Computer-Aided Design, 24, 178–191.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mallet, J.L.
    [2004] Space-time mathematical framework for sedimentary geology. Mathematical Geology, 36(1).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Moyen, R.
    [2005] Paramétrisation 3D de l’espace en géologiesédimentaire: le modèleGeoChron. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lorraine-ENSG, Nancy, France.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Renaudeau, J., Irakarama, M., Laurent, G., Maerten, F. and Caumon, G.
    [2018] Implicit modeling of geological structures: A Cartesian grid method handling discontinuities with ghost points. In: 41st International Conference on Boundary Elements and other Mesh Reduction Methods. New Forest, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Renaudeau, J., Malvesin, E., Maerten, F. and Caumon, G.
    [2019] Implicit Structural Modeling by Minimization of the Bending Energy with Moving Least Squares Functions. Mathematical Geosciences, 51, 693–724.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Stein, O., Grinspun, E., Wardetzky, M. and Jacobson, A.
    [2018] Natural Boundary Conditions for Smoothing in Geometry Processing. ACM, 37(2).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Wang, J., Zhao, H., Bi, L. and Wang, L.
    [2018] Implicit 3D Modeling of Ore Body from Geological Boreholes Data Using Hermite Radial Basis Functions. Minerals, 8(10).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Wellmann, F. and Caumon, G.
    [2018] Chapter One -3-D Structural geological models: Concepts, methods, and uncertainties. Advances in Geophysics, 59, Elsevier, 1–121.
    [Google Scholar]