1887

Abstract

Summary

Within this study, a vertical buzz test methodology is applied to characterize the distance at which the electromagnetic interference generated by a UAV platform attenuates below the sensitivity threshold of a high-resolution magnetometer in a controlled setting. A DJI Wind 4 heavy-lift, multi-rotor UAV platform was used to characterize the spatial extent of the electromagnetic interference generated inflight. The vertical setback distance of a UAV-borne aeromagnetic system was characterized using a vertical buzz test maneuver in a magnetically quiet area. Through conducting the characterization test, it was determined that the DJI Wind 4 with a 2.2 kg payload required a vertical setback distance of approximately 5 m when surveying with a magnetometer employing a sensitivity of 0.01 nT. Furthermore, it was determined that a magnetometers vertical setback distance is unique for each specific combination of UAV platform and magnetometer employed within a UAV-borne aeromagnetic system. Based on previous tests, using the same magnetometer and methodology, the vertical setback distance was determined to be 3 m, for both a DJI - S900 and M600. Therefore, the assessment shown herein should be conducted to characterize the vertical setback distance for specific UAV magnetometry systems (each platform and magnetometer) prior to conducting surveys.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202113170
2021-10-18
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kolster, M. E. and Døssing, A.
    [2021] Scalar magnetic difference inversion applied to UAV-based UXO detection. Geophysical Journal International, 224(1), 468–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MalehmirA., DynesiusL., PaulussonK., PaulussonA., JohanssonH., BastaniM., WedmarkM. and MarsdenP.
    [2017] The potential of rotary-wing UAV-based magnetic surveys for mineral exploration: A case study from central Sweden. The Leading Edge, 36, 552–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nikulin, A. and de Smet, T. S.
    [2019] A UAV-based magnetic survey method to detect and identify orphaned oil and gas wells. The Leading Edge, 38, 447–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. de Smet, T. S., NikulinA., RomanzoN., GraberN., DietrichC., and PuliaievA.
    [2021] Successful application of drone-based aeromagnetic surveys to locate legacy oil and gas wells in Cattaraugus County, New York. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 185, 104250.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Stoll, J. B.
    [2013] Unmanned aircraft systems for rapid near surface geophysical measurements. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 1, 391–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tuck, L., SamsonC., LalibertéJ., WellsM. and Bélanger, F.
    [2018] Magnetic interference testing method for an electric fixed-wing unmanned aircraft system. Unmanned Vehicle System, 6(3), 177–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tuck, L., Samson, C., Polowick, C. and Laliberté, J.
    [2019] Real-time compensation of magnetic data acquired by a single-rotor unmanned aircraft system. Geophysical Prospecting, 67(6), 1637–1651.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Walter, C. A., Braun, A. and Fotopoulos, G.
    [2020] High-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle aeromagnetic surveys for mineral exploration targets. Geophysical Prospecting, 68(1), 334–349.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [2021] Characterizing electromagnetic interference signals for unmanned aerial vehicle geophysical surveys. Geophysics, (in review).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202113170
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202113170
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error